Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 13
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3614 (2026)

Proof of guilt

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In order to find a person guilty of violating the provisions of section 13-3613, it is not necessary to prove that the child has actually become dependent or delinquent, if it appears from the evidence that through any act of neglect or omission of duty, or by any improper act or conduct on the part of such person the dependency or delinquency of a child may have been caused or merely encouraged.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1982–1995 · leading case: State v. Sanderson, 898 P.2d 483 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Sanderson, 898 P.2d 483 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “” A.R.S. § 13-3614. We find no reversible error.”
State v. DeBoucher, 660 P.2d 471 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 2× “” A.R.S. § 13-3614. A dependent person is one “[w]hose home, by reason of neglect .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.