A. A person who is arrested without a warrant shall without unnecessary delay be taken before the nearest or most accessible magistrate in the county in which the arrest occurs or, if the offense that the person is being arrested for was committed in another county, before either the nearest or most accessible magistrate in the county in which the arrest occurs or a magistrate in the county where the offense was committed, and a complaint shall be made before the magistrate setting forth the facts, and the basis for his statement of the facts, showing the offense for which the person was arrested.
B. Subsection A of this section does not apply if the person making the arrest is a peace officer and decides to proceed under the provisions of section 13-3903.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 1992–2007 · leading case:
In re MH 2006-002044, 170 P.3d 280 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
In re MH 2006-002044, 170 P.3d 280 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 2× “Pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-3898 (2001), then A.R.S. § 13-1418, the defendant, arrested without a warrant, was supposed to have been brought before a magistrate “without unnecessary delay.”
State v. Conde, 846 P.2d 843 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992).
“") § 13-3898(A) states: A person arrested without a warrant shall without unnecessary delay be taken before the nearest or most accessible magistrate in the county in which the arrest occurs, and a complaint shall be made before the magistrate setting forth the facts, and the…”
Frohlich v. City Court, 995 P.2d 714 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 5× “before the nearest or most accessible magistrate” pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-3898(A) or, pursuant to § 13-3898(B), “proceed under the provisions of § 13-3903” and release the person after issuing a notice and complaint.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3898(A) — 2 cases
State v. Conde, 846 P.2d 843 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992).
“") § 13-3898(A) states: A person arrested without a warrant shall without unnecessary delay be taken before the nearest or most accessible magistrate in the county in which the arrest occurs, and a complaint shall be made before the magistrate setting forth the facts, and the…”
Frohlich v. City Court, 995 P.2d 714 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
“before the nearest or most accessible magistrate” pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-3898(A) or, pursuant to § 13-3898(B), “proceed under the provisions of § 13-3903” and release the person after issuing a notice and complaint.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3898(B) — 1 case
Frohlich v. City Court, 995 P.2d 714 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
“before the nearest or most accessible magistrate” pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-3898(A) or, pursuant to § 13-3898(B), “proceed under the provisions of § 13-3903” and release the person after issuing a notice and complaint.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.