Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-4701 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:

1. "Chop shop" means any building, lot or other premises in which one or more persons alters, destroys, disassembles, dismantles, reassembles or stores at least one motor vehicle or watercraft or two or more motor vehicle or watercraft parts from at least one vehicle or watercraft that the person or persons knows were obtained by theft, fraud or conspiracy to defraud with the intent to:

(a) Alter, counterfeit, deface, destroy, disguise, falsify, forge, obliterate or remove the identity of the motor vehicles or motor vehicle parts, including the vehicle identification number for the purpose of misrepresenting or preventing the identification of the motor vehicles or motor vehicle parts.

(b) Sell or dispose of the motor vehicles or motor vehicle parts.

2. "Motor vehicle" means any self-propelled vehicle.

3. "Unidentifiable" means that specially trained investigative personnel who are experienced in motor vehicle theft investigative procedures and motor vehicle identification examination techniques cannot establish the uniqueness of a motor vehicle or motor vehicle part.

4. "Vehicle identification number" means the number that the manufacturer or the United States or a state department of transportation assigns to a motor vehicle for the purpose of identifying the motor vehicle or a major component part of the motor vehicle. Vehicle identification number includes any combination of numbers or letters.

5. "Watercraft" has the same meaning as prescribed in section 5-301.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2014–2019 · leading case: State v. Ramos, 330 P.3d 987 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Ramos, 330 P.3d 987 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “]” A.R.S. § 13-4701(1). As relevant here, to prove Ramos committed theft of a means of transportation, the State was required to show that Ramos “control[led] another person’s means of transportation knowing or having reason to know that the property is stolen.”

State v. Trimble (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019). “2 Arizona Revised Statutes section 13-4701 defines “Chop shop” as: any building, lot or other premises in which one or more persons alters, destroys, disassembles, dismantles, reassembles or stores at least one motor vehicle or watercraft or two or more motor vehicle or…”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-4701(1) — 1 case

State v. Ramos, 330 P.3d 987 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). “]” A.R.S. § 13-4701(1). As relevant here, to prove Ramos committed theft of a means of transportation, the State was required to show that Ramos “control[led] another person’s means of transportation knowing or having reason to know that the property is stolen.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.