Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 13

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-802

Fines for misdemeanors

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. A sentence to pay a fine for a class 1 misdemeanor shall be a sentence to pay an amount, fixed by the court, not more than two thousand five hundred dollars.

B. A sentence to pay a fine for a class 2 misdemeanor shall be a sentence to pay an amount, fixed by the court, not more than seven hundred fifty dollars.

C. A sentence to pay a fine for a class 3 misdemeanor shall be a sentence to pay an amount, fixed by the court, not more than five hundred dollars.

D. A sentence to pay a fine for a petty offense shall be a sentence to pay an amount, fixed by the court, of not more than three hundred dollars.

E. A judgment that the defendant shall pay a fine, with or without the alternative of imprisonment, shall constitute a lien in like manner as a judgment for money rendered in a civil action.

F. This section does not apply to an enterprise.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2021 · leading case: Benitez v. Dunevant
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Benitez v. Dunevant (2000) ariz · cites it 8× “§ 13-707(A)(1) (1989), and a fine of $2500, see A.R.S. § 13-802(A) (1989). Additionally, under A.”
State v. Moreno (1982) arizctapp · cites it 4× “§ 13-707(1)), and a fine of $1,000 (A.R.S. § 13-802(A)). Even that is not a "petty offense" under the standard of Goldman v.”
Jose Roberto Fernandez-Ruiz v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General (2006) ca9 “” Compare Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-802 (A)(1) & (C) (1992), with Corona-Sanchez, 291 F.”
Jose Roberto Fernandez-Ruiz v. Alberto R. Gonzales , Attorney General (2005) ca9 “” Compare Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 13-802(A)(1) & (C) (1992), with Corona-Sanchez, 291 F.”
Stoudamire v. State of Arizona (2006) arizctapp · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. §§ 13-802(A), 13-707(A)(1). And the penalties for possession of controlled substances and drug paraphernalia are further restricted by A.”
Ottaway v. Smith (2005) arizctapp · cites it 2× “3d at 103 ; see also A.R.S. § 13-802(A) (2003) (maximum fine for misdemeanor is $2500).”
State Ex Rel. Baumert v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. (1980) ariz · cites it 2× “§ 13-707(1)] and a maximum fine of $1,000 [A.R.S. § 13-802(A)]. No other civil penalty or forfeiture is authorized for this offense except for a term of probation [A.”
State v. Harrison (1990) arizctapp · cites it 2× “§ 13-707(A)(2) and a $750 fine under A.R.S. § 13-802(B). The municipal court imposed a $408 sanction and suspended the defendant’s driver’s license for 90 days for the two civil violations and imposed a $40 fine for violating the glasses restriction.”
Carefree Improvement Ass'n v. City of Scottsdale (1982) arizctapp · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 13-802(C). The court may also order that a successful plaintiff recover his reasonable attorney’s fees from “the defendant state, political subdivision of the state or the incorporated city or town.”
State v. City Court of Tucson (1988) arizctapp · cites it 4× “Ariz. Rev.Stat.Ann. § 13-802(A). Therefore, the crime charged was serious, and he was entitled to a jury trial.”
Burnett v. Bottoms (2005) azd · cites it 2× “§ 707(A)(2); A.R.S. § 13-802(B). Here, there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the subject officers had probable cause to arrest Plaintiff.”
Roubos v. Miller (2006) arizctapp · cites it 2× “1(a)(1); A.R.S. § 13-802(A)-(C). The City also overlooks A.”
Show all 25 citing cases →
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-802(A) — 17 cases
Benitez v. Dunevant (2000) ariz “§ 13-707(A)(1) (1989), and a fine of $2500, see A.R.S. § 13-802(A) (1989). Additionally, under A.”
State v. Moreno (1982) arizctapp “§ 13-707(1)), and a fine of $1,000 (A.R.S. § 13-802(A)). Even that is not a "petty offense" under the standard of Goldman v.”
Stoudamire v. State of Arizona (2006) arizctapp “See A.R.S. §§ 13-802(A), 13-707(A)(1). And the penalties for possession of controlled substances and drug paraphernalia are further restricted by A.”
Ottaway v. Smith (2005) arizctapp “3d at 103 ; see also A.R.S. § 13-802(A) (2003) (maximum fine for misdemeanor is $2500).”
State Ex Rel. Baumert v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. (1980) ariz “§ 13-707(1)] and a maximum fine of $1,000 [A.R.S. § 13-802(A)]. No other civil penalty or forfeiture is authorized for this offense except for a term of probation [A.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-802(A)(1) — 1 case
Jose Roberto Fernandez-Ruiz v. Alberto R. Gonzales , Attorney General (2005) ca9 “” Compare Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 13-802(A)(1) & (C) (1992), with Corona-Sanchez, 291 F.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-802(A)(3) — 1 case
Jardanowski v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA (2000) arizctapp
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-802(B) — 2 cases
State v. Harrison (1990) arizctapp “§ 13-707(A)(2) and a $750 fine under A.R.S. § 13-802(B). The municipal court imposed a $408 sanction and suspended the defendant’s driver’s license for 90 days for the two civil violations and imposed a $40 fine for violating the glasses restriction.”
Burnett v. Bottoms (2005) azd “§ 707(A)(2); A.R.S. § 13-802(B). Here, there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the subject officers had probable cause to arrest Plaintiff.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-802(C) — 1 case
Carefree Improvement Ass'n v. City of Scottsdale (1982) arizctapp “A.R.S. § 13-802(C). The court may also order that a successful plaintiff recover his reasonable attorney’s fees from “the defendant state, political subdivision of the state or the incorporated city or town.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.