A. Unless terminated sooner, probation may continue for the following periods:
1. For a class 2 felony, seven years.
2. For a class 3 felony, five years.
3. For a class 4 felony, four years.
4. For a class 5 or 6 felony, three years.
5. For a class 1 misdemeanor, three years.
6. For a class 2 misdemeanor, two years.
7. For a class 3 misdemeanor, one year.
B. Notwithstanding subsection A of this section, unless terminated sooner, probation may continue for the following periods:
1. For a violation of section 28-1381 or 28-1382, five years.
2. For a violation of section 28-1383, ten years.
C. If the court has required, as a condition of probation, that the defendant make restitution for any economic loss related to the defendant's offense and that condition has not been satisfied, the court at any time before the termination or expiration of probation may extend the period within the following limits:
1. For a felony, not more than five years.
2. For a misdemeanor, not more than two years.
D. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, justice courts and municipal courts may impose the probation periods specified in subsection A, paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 and subsection B, paragraph 1 of this section.
E. After conviction of a felony offense or an attempt to commit any offense that is included in chapter 14 or 35.1 of this title or section 13-2308.01, 13-2308.03, 13-2923, 13-3212 or 13-3623, if probation is available, probation may continue for a term of not less than the term that is specified in subsection A of this section up to and including life and that the court believes is appropriate for the ends of justice.
F. After conviction of a violation of section 13-3824, subsection A, if a term of probation is imposed and the offense for which the person was required to register was a felony, probation may continue for a term of not less than the term that is specified in subsection A of this section up to and including life and that the court believes is appropriate for the ends of justice.
G. If a person is convicted on or after November 1, 2006 of a dangerous crime against children as defined in section 13-705, a term of probation is imposed, the person is required to register pursuant to section 13-3821 and the person is classified as a level three offender pursuant to section 13-3825, the court shall require global position system or electronic monitoring for the duration of the term of probation. The court may impose a fee on the probationer to offset the cost of the monitoring device required by this subsection. The fee shall be deposited in the adult probation services fund pursuant to section 12-267, subsection A, paragraph 3. This subsection does not preclude global position system or electronic monitoring of any other person who is serving a term of probation.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
74
cases (
12 in the last 5 years), 1978–2026 · leading case:
State v. Peek
State v. Peek (2008)
ariz · cites it 14×
“255, §§ 8, 17 (adding § 13-902(D), which was renumbered as 13-902(E)).”
Jackson v. Schneider (2004)
arizctapp · cites it 17×
“As a term of his probation, he was incarcerated for twelve consecutive weekends.”
Coy v. Fields (2001)
arizctapp · cites it 9×
“2 Petitioner requested that the respondent judge reduce the fifteen-year term of probation to three years, noting that the maximum term of probation for a class six felony is three years, see A.R.S. § 13-902(A)(4), and that § 13-902(E), which allows for the imposition of up to…”
State v. Quintana (1999)
arizctapp · cites it 32×
“§ 13-901(A) authorizes a probationary disposition in eligible cases, and § 13-901(B) prescribes that "[t]he period shall be determined according to § 13-902." A.R.S. § 13-902(A) provides that probation for a class 1 misdemeanor "may continue for.”
State v. Korzuch (1996)
ariz · cites it 11×
“The trial judge signed the proposed order by which defendant's probation was purportedly "extended for a period of three years from June 7, 1993 pursuant to A.R.S. 13-902(B)" for the reason that restitution was not complete.”
State v. Gomez (2006)
ariz · cites it 4×
“See A.R.S. §§ 13-902(A)(3) & (4) (2001), -3405(C) (2001), -3407(C) (2001) (allowing terms of probation for class 4 and 6 drug felonies).”
Demarce v. Willrich (2002)
arizctapp · cites it 10×
“We note that Demarce pled guilty to sexual abuse, an offense under chapter 14 of the criminal code, and one that is subject to a term of statutory probation not less than that specified in A.R.S. § 13-902(A) “up to and including life.”
State v. Grady (2019)
nc · cites it 2×
“027 (d), (g)(3) (2018); Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-902 (G) (Supp.”
State v. Turner (2016)
arizctapp · cites it 18×
“]” ¶ 11 Turning to that separate provision, § 13-902 is entitled “Periods of probation; monitoring; fees.”
James Dean Clark v. James R. Ricketts (1992)
ca9 · cites it 5×
“Whether the Arizona death penalty statute under which Clark was sentenced to death, Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 13-902, is constitutional.”
State v. Reyes (2013)
arizctapp · cites it 2×
“, AR.S. § 13-902(G) (West 2013) (permitting the court to “impose a fee on the probationer to offset the cost of the [electronic] monitoring device required by this subsection”); AR.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(A) — 9 cases
State v. Quintana (1999)
arizctapp
“§ 13-901(A) authorizes a probationary disposition in eligible cases, and § 13-901(B) prescribes that "[t]he period shall be determined according to § 13-902." A.R.S. § 13-902(A) provides that probation for a class 1 misdemeanor "may continue for.”
Demarce v. Willrich (2002)
arizctapp
“We note that Demarce pled guilty to sexual abuse, an offense under chapter 14 of the criminal code, and one that is subject to a term of statutory probation not less than that specified in A.R.S. § 13-902(A) “up to and including life.”
State v. Turner (2016)
arizctapp
“]” ¶ 11 Turning to that separate provision, § 13-902 is entitled “Periods of probation; monitoring; fees.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(A)(1) — 2 cases
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(A)(2) — 2 cases
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(A)(3) — 3 cases
State v. Gomez (2006)
ariz
“See A.R.S. §§ 13-902(A)(3) & (4) (2001), -3405(C) (2001), -3407(C) (2001) (allowing terms of probation for class 4 and 6 drug felonies).”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(A)(4) — 5 cases
Coy v. Fields (2001)
arizctapp
“2 Petitioner requested that the respondent judge reduce the fifteen-year term of probation to three years, noting that the maximum term of probation for a class six felony is three years, see A.R.S. § 13-902(A)(4), and that § 13-902(E), which allows for the imposition of up to…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(A)(5) — 2 cases
Jackson v. Schneider (2004)
arizctapp
“As a term of his probation, he was incarcerated for twelve consecutive weekends.”
State v. Quintana (1999)
arizctapp
“§ 13-901(A) authorizes a probationary disposition in eligible cases, and § 13-901(B) prescribes that "[t]he period shall be determined according to § 13-902." A.R.S. § 13-902(A) provides that probation for a class 1 misdemeanor "may continue for.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(A)(5)(4) — 1 case
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(B) — 4 cases
State v. Korzuch (1996)
ariz
“The trial judge signed the proposed order by which defendant's probation was purportedly "extended for a period of three years from June 7, 1993 pursuant to A.R.S. 13-902(B)" for the reason that restitution was not complete.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(B)(1) — 2 cases
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(B)(2) — 1 case
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(C) — 5 cases
State v. Turner (2016)
arizctapp
“]” ¶ 11 Turning to that separate provision, § 13-902 is entitled “Periods of probation; monitoring; fees.”
State v. Korzuch (1996)
ariz
“The trial judge signed the proposed order by which defendant's probation was purportedly "extended for a period of three years from June 7, 1993 pursuant to A.R.S. 13-902(B)" for the reason that restitution was not complete.”
State v. Quintana (1999)
arizctapp
“§ 13-901(A) authorizes a probationary disposition in eligible cases, and § 13-901(B) prescribes that "[t]he period shall be determined according to § 13-902." A.R.S. § 13-902(A) provides that probation for a class 1 misdemeanor "may continue for.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(C)(1) — 1 case
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(D) — 1 case
State v. Peek (2008)
ariz
“255, §§ 8, 17 (adding § 13-902(D), which was renumbered as 13-902(E)).”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(E) — 25 cases
State v. Peek (2008)
ariz
“255, §§ 8, 17 (adding § 13-902(D), which was renumbered as 13-902(E)).”
Coy v. Fields (2001)
arizctapp
“2 Petitioner requested that the respondent judge reduce the fifteen-year term of probation to three years, noting that the maximum term of probation for a class six felony is three years, see A.R.S. § 13-902(A)(4), and that § 13-902(E), which allows for the imposition of up to…”
Jackson v. Schneider (2004)
arizctapp
“As a term of his probation, he was incarcerated for twelve consecutive weekends.”
Demarce v. Willrich (2002)
arizctapp
“We note that Demarce pled guilty to sexual abuse, an offense under chapter 14 of the criminal code, and one that is subject to a term of statutory probation not less than that specified in A.R.S. § 13-902(A) “up to and including life.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(E)(6) — 1 case
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(F)(3) — 4 cases
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(F)(5) — 2 cases
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(F)(6) — 4 cases
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-902(G) — 9 cases
State v. Reyes (2013)
arizctapp
“, AR.S. § 13-902(G) (West 2013) (permitting the court to “impose a fee on the probationer to offset the cost of the [electronic] monitoring device required by this subsection”); AR.”
State v. Quintana (1999)
arizctapp
“§ 13-901(A) authorizes a probationary disposition in eligible cases, and § 13-901(B) prescribes that "[t]he period shall be determined according to § 13-902." A.R.S. § 13-902(A) provides that probation for a class 1 misdemeanor "may continue for.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.