Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 13
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-912 (2026)

Apprenticeship programs; hours; location

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

13-912. Apprenticeship programs; hours; location

A probationer who is on standard probation and who is participating in a state or federally recognized apprenticeship program may do both of the following:

1. Work at any hours of the day as long as the probationer remains in good standing with the apprenticeship program.

2. Travel within this state outside of the jurisdiction in which the probationer resides to work in the apprenticeship program.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases, 1981–2018 · leading case: Parker, Springer Jr., Anderson v. Comm. for Sustainable Ret. in Support of Initiative, 314 P.3d 100 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Parker, Springer Jr., Anderson v. Comm. for Sustainable Ret. in Support of Initiative, 314 P.3d 100 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 7× “2d at 489 (§ 13-912 provides for automatic restoration of rights of first-time felony offenders but inapplicable when person convicted of more than one felony, even if convictions on same occasion; other convicted felons must apply for restoration of rights before eligible to…”
State v. Nixon, 394 P.3d 667 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 6× “A.R.S. § 13-912(A)-(B). ¶ 3 Nixon completed probation in 2002.”
Harvey v. Brewer, 605 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 4× “§ 13-904(A)(1), and automatically restoring those rights to any person convicted of only one felony, provided he: "1.”
State v. Key, 626 P.2d 149 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 8× “Thereafter, on appellant’s application, Judge Goodfarb entered an order making these findings: (1) that appellant had completed probation and was entitled to an order restoring his civil rights pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-912; (2) that the vacation of judgment and dismissal of…”
Terrence Johnson v. Phil Bredesen, 624 F.3d 742 (6th Cir. 2010). “3d at 1070 (quoting Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-912 (A)). The Ninth Circuit upheld the restitution- repayment requirement on the grounds that “Arizona has a rational basis for restoring voting rights only to those felons who have completed the terms of their sentences, which includes…”
State v. Buonafede, 814 P.2d 1381 (Ariz. 1991). · cites it 4× “A.R.S. § 13-912. A person convicted of two or more felonies, such as Buonafede, may apply for a discretionary restoration of civil rights under A.”
State of Arizona v. Dauntorian Lydel Sanders, 425 P.3d 1056 (Ariz. 2018). · cites it 6× “A.R.S. § 13-912(A). However, restoration of the right to possess a weapon is not automatic; to restore this right, a person must file an application with the court.”
State of Arizona v. Debbie Lynn Copeland, 310 P.3d 46 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 13-912. 4 . In granting Copeland’s motion, the respondent judge did not identify her reasons for rejecting the state’s argument that § 13-907(D) precluded such relief.”
State of Arizona v. Raymond Anthony Hall, 322 P.3d 191 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). “Section 13-912, A.R.S., provides for the automatic restoration of all civil rights for first time felony offenders meeting certain criteria, with the exception of the “right to possess weapons.”
United States v. James DeWayne Nix, 438 F.3d 1284 (11th Cir. 2006). “at 1128 (citing Ariz. Rev.Stat. Ann. § 13-912, which generally and automatically restores to a felon “any civil rights which were lost or suspended by the conviction” after absolute discharge from imprisonment).”
United States v. Cerverizzo, 74 F.3d 629 (5th Cir. 1996). “Ariz.Rev.Stat Ann. § 13-912 (West 1995).”
United States v. Theodore Albert Geyler, 932 F.2d 1330 (9th Cir. 1991). “, Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 13-912 (1978). Because there is no federal procedure for restoring civil rights to a federal felon, Congress could not have expected that the federal government would perform this function.”
Show all 21 citing cases →
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-912(A) — 6 cases
Parker, Springer Jr., Anderson v. Comm. for Sustainable Ret. in Support of Initiative, 314 P.3d 100 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). “2d at 489 (§ 13-912 provides for automatic restoration of rights of first-time felony offenders but inapplicable when person convicted of more than one felony, even if convictions on same occasion; other convicted felons must apply for restoration of rights before eligible to…”
Harvey v. Brewer, 605 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2010). “§ 13-904(A)(1), and automatically restoring those rights to any person convicted of only one felony, provided he: "1.”
State v. Nixon, 394 P.3d 667 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “A.R.S. § 13-912(A)-(B). ¶ 3 Nixon completed probation in 2002.”
State of Arizona v. Dauntorian Lydel Sanders, 425 P.3d 1056 (Ariz. 2018). “A.R.S. § 13-912(A). However, restoration of the right to possess a weapon is not automatic; to restore this right, a person must file an application with the court.”
Harvey v. Brewer, 605 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2010).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-912(A)(2) — 2 cases
Harvey v. Brewer, 605 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2010). “§ 13-904(A)(1), and automatically restoring those rights to any person convicted of only one felony, provided he: "1.”
Harvey v. Brewer, 605 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2010).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-912(B) — 3 cases
State v. Nixon, 394 P.3d 667 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “A.R.S. § 13-912(A)-(B). ¶ 3 Nixon completed probation in 2002.”
State of Arizona v. Dauntorian Lydel Sanders, 425 P.3d 1056 (Ariz. 2018). “A.R.S. § 13-912(A). However, restoration of the right to possess a weapon is not automatic; to restore this right, a person must file an application with the court.”
State v. Gallegos (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.