A. If a claim which will become due at a future time or a contingent or unliquidated claim becomes due or certain before the distribution of the estate, and if the claim has been allowed or established by a proceeding, it is paid in the same manner as presently due and absolute claims of the same class.
B. In other cases the personal representative or, on petition of the personal representative or the claimant in a special proceeding for the purpose, the court may provide for payment as follows:
1. If the claimant consents, he may be paid the present or agreed value of the claim, taking any uncertainty into account.
2. Arrangement for future payment, or possible payment, on the happening of the contingency or on liquidation may be made by creating a trust, giving a mortgage, obtaining a bond or security from a distributee, or otherwise.
Notes of Decisions
Gorman v. State ex rel. Owens, 155 P.3d 1054 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 11× “Gorman contends that A.R.S. § 14-3810 therefore required the court to arrange for future payment upon liquidation, rather than payment of an estimated claim.”
Chalker v. Chalker, 430 P.3d 375 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 4× “, establishing their Claim for attorney fees through that proceeding-they argue their Claim must be "paid in the same manner as presently due and absolute claims of the same class," A.R.S. § 14-3810(A), by "bear[ing] interest at the legal rate" beginning sixty days after the…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-3810(A) — 2 cases
Gorman v. State ex rel. Owens, 155 P.3d 1054 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
“Gorman contends that A.R.S. § 14-3810 therefore required the court to arrange for future payment upon liquidation, rather than payment of an estimated claim.”
Chalker v. Chalker, 430 P.3d 375 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
“, establishing their Claim for attorney fees through that proceeding-they argue their Claim must be "paid in the same manner as presently due and absolute claims of the same class," A.R.S. § 14-3810(A), by "bear[ing] interest at the legal rate" beginning sixty days after the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.