Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 20-230 (2026)

Retaliation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. When by or pursuant to the laws of any other state or foreign country any premium or income or other taxes, or any fees, fines, penalties, licenses, deposit requirements or other material obligations, prohibitions or restrictions are imposed on insurers domiciled in this state doing business, or that might seek to do business in such other state or country, or on the agents of such insurers, which in the aggregate are in excess of such taxes, fees, fines, penalties, licenses, deposit requirements or other obligations, prohibitions or restrictions directly imposed on similar insurers domiciled in such other state or foreign country under the statutes of this state, as long as such laws continue in force or are so applied, the same obligations, prohibitions and restrictions of whatever kind shall be imposed on similar insurers domiciled in such other state or foreign country doing business in this state. Any tax, license or other obligation imposed by any city, county or other political subdivision of a state or foreign country on insurers of this state or their agents shall be deemed to be imposed by such state or foreign country within the meaning of this section. For the purpose of this section, the director shall compute the burden of any tax, license or other obligation imposed by any city, county or other political subdivision of a state or foreign country on insurers of this state or their agents on an aggregate statewide or foreign countrywide basis as an addition to the rate of tax payable by Arizona insurers in such state or foreign country. The addition to the rate of tax payable by Arizona life insurers shall be calculated separately from the addition to the rate of tax payable by other Arizona insurers. In each case, the addition to the rate of tax payable by Arizona insurers shall be calculated by dividing the aggregate of the tax obligations paid by Arizona insurers to any such city, county or other political subdivision of such state or foreign country by the aggregate of their taxable premiums under the premium taxing statute of such state or foreign country. The director may issue rules to carry out the purpose of this section. This section does not apply to ad valorem taxes on real or personal property or to personal income taxes or to assessments on or credits to insurers for the payment of claims of policyholders of insolvent insurers. This subsection does not apply to insurers that do business in this state and that are domiciled in another state or foreign country that does not impose retaliatory taxes, or whose laws, on a reciprocal basis, exempt from retaliatory taxes similar insurers domiciled in this state doing business, or that might seek to do business in the other state or foreign country.

B. If an insurer domiciled in this state is refused authority to transact insurance in another state on a plan and in a manner that is permitted for domestic insurers of such other state, notwithstanding that the insurer of this state is fully qualified for such authority in accordance with the applicable laws of such other state, and if such refusal is not accompanied by a written statement of the grounds therefor, then and thereafter, and for as long as such refusal shall continue, the director may refuse to grant an initial certificate of authority, but not a renewal of an existing certificate of authority, to any insurer domiciled in such other state that may seek to transact in this state a like kind or kinds of insurance.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1964–1999 · leading case: Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Comm'r of Revenue, 709 N.E.2d 1096 (Mass. 1999).
Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Comm'r of Revenue, 709 N.E.2d 1096 (Mass. 1999). “270 (Lexis 1998); Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 20-230 (West 1990 & Supp.”
Metro. Life Ins. v. Ins. Comm'r, 473 A.2d 933 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1984). “270 (1966); Ariz. Rev.Stat.Ann. § 20-230 (Supp.1983); Ark.”
Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Bushnell, 396 P.2d 253 (Ariz. 1964). · cites it 4× “On this return appellant contended that its tax should be computed under A.R.S. § 20-230, the Retaliatory Insurance Tax Act; that it should be given Credit for ad valorem taxes paid in Arizona; and that the tax was not due until June IS, rather than on March 31 as' provided iii…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.