Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 20-626 (2026)

Claims of nonresidents against domestic insurers

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. In a delinquency proceeding begun in this state against a domestic insurer, claimants residing in reciprocal states may file claims either with the ancillary receivers, if any, in their respective states, or with the domiciliary receiver. All such claims shall be filed on or before the last date fixed for the filing of claims in the domiciliary delinquency proceedings.

B. Controverted claims belonging to claimants residing in reciprocal states may either be proved in this state, or if ancillary proceedings have been commenced in such reciprocal states, may be proved in those proceedings. In the event a claimant elects to prove his claim in ancillary proceedings, if notice of the claim and opportunity to appear and be heard is afforded the domiciliary receiver of this state as provided in section 20-627 with respect to ancillary proceedings in this state, the final allowance of such claim by the courts in the ancillary state shall be accepted in this state as conclusive as to its amount and shall also be accepted as conclusive as to its priority, if any, against special deposits or other security located within the ancillary state, but shall not be conclusive as to its priority against general assets under section 20-629.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1993–1998 · leading case: U.S. Fin. Corp. v. Warfield, 839 F. Supp. 684 (D. Ariz. 1993).
U.S. Fin. Corp. v. Warfield, 839 F. Supp. 684 (D. Ariz. 1993). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. §§ 20-626 to 20-629. This process presumably is intended to and does conserve insurance company assets for ultimate payment to policyholders as well as other creditors.”
Herstam v. Bd. of Directors, 895 P.2d 1131 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995). “4A) and Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 20-626 (1994 Cum. pocket part) (claims of nonresidents against domestic insurers); § 10-3-555, C.”
AzStar Cas. Co. v. Allied Gen. Agency (In Re Allied Gen. Agency), 229 B.R. 190 (D. Ariz. 1998). · cites it 2× “Ariz. Rev.Stat. § 20-626(A) (“claimants residing in reciprocal states may file claims either with the ancillary receivers, if any, in their respective states, or with the domiciliary -receiver.”
Smith v. Farm & Home Life Ins., 506 S.E.2d 104 (Ga. 1998). “surer’s title to property, is the substantial equivalent of ARS § 20-625 (B); (3) OCGA § 33-37-52, concerning the Insurance Commissioner’s possible appointment as ancillary receiver for a non-domiciliary insurer, is the substantial equivalent of ARS § 20-625; (4) OCGA §…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 20-626(A) — 1 case
AzStar Cas. Co. v. Allied Gen. Agency (In Re Allied Gen. Agency), 229 B.R. 190 (D. Ariz. 1998). “Ariz. Rev.Stat. § 20-626(A) (“claimants residing in reciprocal states may file claims either with the ancillary receivers, if any, in their respective states, or with the domiciliary -receiver.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.