Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 20-631 (2026)
Uniform insurers liquidation act
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A. Section 20-611, paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19 and sections 20-613, 20-614, 20-624, 20-625, 20-626, 20-627, 20-628, 20-629 and 20-630 are and may be cited as the uniform insurers liquidation act.
B. The uniform insurers liquidation act shall be so interpreted and construed as to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law of those states that enact it. To the extent that its provisions when applicable conflict with other provisions of this article the provisions of such act shall control.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1969–1998 · leading case: Trimble v. Am. Sav. Life Ins., 733 P.2d 1131 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986).
Trimble v. Am. Sav. Life Ins., 733 P.2d 1131 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986). “Trimble, the Director of Insurance, as the statutory receiver for American Savings, and designated Jerry Angle as a deputy receiver, pursuant to A.R.S. § 20-631. American Savings appealed.”
U.S. Fin. Corp. v. Warfield, 839 F. Supp. 684 (D. Ariz. 1993). “See A.R.S. § 20-631. The Superior Court on November 19, 1992 also issued an injunction enjoining all persons or entities from commencing any suit against AzStar or against any of its assets except through the filing of administrative claims with the receiver.”
Irwin v. Pac. Am. Life Ins. Co., 457 P.2d 736 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1969). “A reading of the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act, see A.R.S. § 20-631, indicates that there was no intention that reha-bilitations, liquidations or reorganizations be considered substantially different, as evidenced by the insisted and continued use of the word delinquency…”
Pioneer Annuity Life Ins. v. Nat'l Equity Life Ins., 765 P.2d 550 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988). “Two matters are in issue in this proceeding pursuant to the uniform insurers liquidation act, the elements of which are specified in A.R.S. § 20-631. In the first, the appellant receiver for the subsidiary contends that the traceable proceeds of $1,200,000 paid to the appellee…”
State Ex Rel. Low v. Imperial Ins., 682 P.2d 431 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). “§ 20-627(B) does not control the claims procedure in this case because, as specified in A.R.S. § 20-631, this section is part of the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act, and California is a non-reciprocal state.”
AzStar Cas. Co. v. Allied Gen. Agency (In Re Allied Gen. Agency), 229 B.R. 190 (D. Ariz. 1998). “Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 20-631 (A) provides that paragraphs 1 to 5, inclusive, and paragraphs 7 to 13, inclusive, of § 20-611, together with §§ 20-613, 20-614, and 20-624 to 20-630, inclusive, are and may be cited as the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act.”
Navajo Life Ins. v. Fid. & Deposit Co. of Maryland, 807 F. Supp. 1485 (D. Ariz. 1992). “These statutes give the Arizona Superior Court original jurisdiction of insurance liquidation proceedings and the power to make all necessary and proper orders to carry out insurance company liquidation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.