A. In each city or town incorporated under the general laws of this state, there shall be a municipal court.
B. Every court established pursuant to subsection A, and every court established in a city incorporated under the provisions of title 9, chapter 2, article 5 or incorporated under the provisions of a special act or charter, has jurisdiction of all cases arising under the ordinances of the city or town, and has jurisdiction concurrently with justices of the peace of precincts in which the city or town is located, of violations of laws of the state committed within the limits of the city or town.
C. Notwithstanding subsections A and B and in lieu of establishing or maintaining a municipal court, a city or town may enter into an intergovernmental agreement as authorized by title 11, chapter 7, article 3 to provide the services of a municipal court, including the jurisdiction of all cases arising under the ordinances of the city or town, with either:
1. A justice of the peace in whose jurisdiction the city or town is located and the county in which the city or town is located.
2. Another city or town located within the same county as the city or town.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
16
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1966–2023 · leading case:
Winter v. Coor, 695 P.2d 1094 (Ariz. 1985).
Winter v. Coor, 695 P.2d 1094 (Ariz. 1985).
· cites it 4× “A.R.S. § 22-402(A) requires that “In each city or town incorporated under the general laws of this state, there shall be a police court.”
State v. Mercurio, 736 P.2d 819 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987).
· cites it 5× “See A.R.S. § 22-402 (quoted infra, at 340, 736 P.”
Roubos v. Miller, 138 P.3d 735 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 4× “In so doing, she relied on language in A.R.S. § 22-402 and Wissner v. State, 21 Ariz.”
City of Tucson v. Superior Court, 809 P.2d 428 (Ariz. 1991).
· cites it 2× “2d at 1096 (citing A.R.S. § 22-402(B)). We have noted that “for many citizens of this state, the magistrate courts represent their only contact with the judicial system.”
Benitez v. Dunevant, 979 P.2d 1017 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 2× “Petitioner argues that section 22-320 applies only to justice courts, and is in any event unconstitutional.”
Wissner v. State, 520 P.2d 526 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1974).
· cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 22-402. Thus, we see that it has no jurisdiction of civil matters.”
City of Phoenix v. Coulter, 515 P.2d 856 (Ariz. 1973).
· cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 22-402 B provides for concurrent jurisdiction in city courts of incorporated cities with justices of the peace over all violations of the laws of the State of Arizona committed within the corporate limits.”
State v. Superior Court, 410 P.2d 502 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1966).
“Section 22-402 vests the Municipal Court with jurisdiction to hear offenses which are violations of state statutes with certain jurisdictional exceptions which we need not note here.”
Meadows v. Grant, 486 P.2d 216 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1971).
· cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 22-402. In such capacity he is charged with the express duty, under A.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 22-402(A) — 1 case
Winter v. Coor, 695 P.2d 1094 (Ariz. 1985).
“A.R.S. § 22-402(A) requires that “In each city or town incorporated under the general laws of this state, there shall be a police court.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 22-402(B) — 6 cases
Winter v. Coor, 695 P.2d 1094 (Ariz. 1985).
“A.R.S. § 22-402(A) requires that “In each city or town incorporated under the general laws of this state, there shall be a police court.”
City of Tucson v. Superior Court, 809 P.2d 428 (Ariz. 1991).
“2d at 1096 (citing A.R.S. § 22-402(B)). We have noted that “for many citizens of this state, the magistrate courts represent their only contact with the judicial system.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.