Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-350

Definitions

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In this article, unless the context otherwise requires:

1. "Department" means the labor department of the industrial commission of Arizona.

2. "Employee" means any person who performs services for an employer under a contract of employment either made in this state or to be performed wholly or partly within this state.

3. "Employer" means any individual, partnership, association, joint stock company, trust or corporation, the administrator or executor of the estate of a deceased individual or the receiver, trustee or successor of any of such persons employing any person. Employer also includes this state and any county, municipality, school district or other political subdivision of this state.

4. "Hours worked" includes all time an employee is employed.

5. "Minimum wage" means the nondiscretionary minimum compensation due an employee by reason of employment, including the employee's commissions, but excluding tips or gratuities.

6. "Payroll card account" means an account that is directly or indirectly established through an employer and to which electronic fund transfers of an employee's wages are made on a recurring basis whether the account is operated or managed by the employer, a third-party payroll processor, a depository institution or any other person.

7. "Wages" means nondiscretionary compensation due an employee in return for labor or services rendered by an employee for which the employee has a reasonable expectation to be paid whether determined by a time, task, piece, commission or other method of calculation.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 130 cases (92 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case: Colson v. Avnet, Inc.
Colson v. Avnet, Inc. (2010) azd · cites it 8× “, and two state wage laws — Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-350 , et seq., and Or.”
Orfaly v. Tucson Symphony Society (2004) arizctapp · cites it 3× “§ 23-350(5), which defines “[w]ages” as “nondiseretionary compensation due an employee in return for labor or services rendered by an employee for which the employee has a reasonable expectation to be paid whether determined by a time, task, piece, commission or other method of…”
Schade v. Diethrich (1988) ariz · cites it 4× “The purpose of A.R.S. § 23-350 is to define the terms used in the sections that follow.”
Douglas v. Governing Board of the Window Rock Consolidated School District No. 8 (2003) arizctapp · cites it 6× “Although the school district must allocate these funds to teacher compensation, given that this compensation is defined as not only payable as salaries but also as “employee fringe benefits and other nonsalary benefits,” A.”
Swanson v. Image Bank, Inc. (2002) arizctapp · cites it 4× “A.R.S. § 23-350(2), (3). During the relevant time frame, Swanson resided, maintained her business office, performed most of her duties, and paid income taxes in Arizona.”
Massachusetts v. Morash (1989) scotus “1988); Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§23-350 to 23-361 (1983 and Supp.”
East v. Bullock's Inc. (1998) azd · cites it 4× “Arizona’s Statutory Wage Laws Count 4 of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint alleges violations of Arizona’s statutory wage laws, A.R.S. § 23-350, et seq. Plaintiff alleges that Bullock’s failed to pay her for all the hours that she worked.”
Osuna v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (2007) arizctapp · cites it 2× “Osuna also sought to add a claim “under the Arizona Wage Act, A.R.S. § 23-350 et seq.,” and a claim asserting Wal-Mart had violated A.”
Baltimore Harbor Charters, Ltd. v. Ayd (2001) md “Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 23-350 (West 1995); Colo.”
Hirst v. Skywest, Inc. (2017) illinoised “, the Arizona Wage Act, A.R.S. § 23-350, et seq. , the Arizona Minimum Wage Act, A.”
Stevenson v. Branch Banking & Trust Corp. (2004) mdctspecapp “, Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 23-350(2)("Wages include .”
Redhair v. Kinerk, Beal, Schmidt, Dyer & Sethi, P.C. (2008) arizctapp · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 23-350(5) (expressly including “bonuses” as form of “wages” in code chapter addressing “Employment Practices and Working Conditions”).”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-350(2) — 25 cases
Swanson v. Image Bank, Inc. (2002) arizctapp “A.R.S. § 23-350(2), (3). During the relevant time frame, Swanson resided, maintained her business office, performed most of her duties, and paid income taxes in Arizona.”
Stevenson v. Branch Banking & Trust Corp. (2004) mdctspecapp “, Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 23-350(2)("Wages include .”
Bilke v. State (1997) arizctapp
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-350(3) — 25 cases
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-350(5) — 11 cases
Orfaly v. Tucson Symphony Society (2004) arizctapp “§ 23-350(5), which defines “[w]ages” as “nondiseretionary compensation due an employee in return for labor or services rendered by an employee for which the employee has a reasonable expectation to be paid whether determined by a time, task, piece, commission or other method of…”
Schade v. Diethrich (1988) ariz “The purpose of A.R.S. § 23-350 is to define the terms used in the sections that follow.”
Douglas v. Governing Board of the Window Rock Consolidated School District No. 8 (2003) arizctapp “Although the school district must allocate these funds to teacher compensation, given that this compensation is defined as not only payable as salaries but also as “employee fringe benefits and other nonsalary benefits,” A.”
Swanson v. Image Bank, Inc. (2002) arizctapp “A.R.S. § 23-350(2), (3). During the relevant time frame, Swanson resided, maintained her business office, performed most of her duties, and paid income taxes in Arizona.”
Redhair v. Kinerk, Beal, Schmidt, Dyer & Sethi, P.C. (2008) arizctapp “See A.R.S. § 23-350(5) (expressly including “bonuses” as form of “wages” in code chapter addressing “Employment Practices and Working Conditions”).”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-350(5)(1995) — 1 case
Douglas v. Governing Board of the Window Rock Consolidated School District No. 8 (2003) arizctapp “Although the school district must allocate these funds to teacher compensation, given that this compensation is defined as not only payable as salaries but also as “employee fringe benefits and other nonsalary benefits,” A.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-350(6) — 2 cases
Holm v. Gateway (2018) arizctapp
Austin v. Chandler (2015) arizctapp
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-350(7) — 15 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.