Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 25
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 25-1301 (2026)

Registration of order for enforcement

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

25-1301. Registration of order for enforcement

A support order or an income withholding order issued in another state or a foreign support order may be registered in this state for enforcement.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2014–2023 · leading case: Marriage of Henderson v. Henderson, 390 P.3d 1226 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marriage of Henderson v. Henderson, 390 P.3d 1226 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “Arizona’s UIFSA allows a “foreign support order” to be “registered in this state for enforcement,” § 25-1301, and defines “[s]upport order” as a “judgment, decree, order, decision, or directive, whether temporary, final or subject to modification, issued in a .”
ades/taylor v. Pandola, 382 P.3d 101 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 12× “A.R.S. § 25-1301; see Glover, 231 Ariz. at 1, ¶ 1 (holding that “compliance with the registration requirements is necessary to confer subject matter jurisdiction on the court”); Polacke v.”
Balazic v. Balazic, 334 P.3d 771 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 5× “See A.R.S. §§ 25-1301 to -1304. The only mention of “jurisdiction” among the enforcement statutes is in the context of ensuring that the issuing tribunal had jurisdiction when it issued the order.”
Sievers-Greene v. Davis (D. Ariz. 2023). · cites it 6× “) Rather, Plaintiff should have registered her orders 7 under A.R.S. § 25-1301, which provides that a foreign support order may be registered in 8 Arizona for enforcement.”
Tiffany Taylor v. Thomas Pandola (Ariz. 2018). · cites it 4× “A.R.S. §§ 25-1301 to -1308. We hold that AUIFSA, by its terms, allows an obligee to contest an obligor’s statement of child support arrears notwithstanding the obligee’s failure to request a hearing within twenty days of receiving notice of the order’s registration.”
Lagman v. Lagman (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 4× “See A.R.S. § 25-1301; Glover v. Glover, 231 Ariz.”
Lagman v. Lagman (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 4× “See A.R.S. § 25-1301; Glover v. Glover, 231 Ariz.”
ades/kaflik v. Freiwald (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 25-1301. A registered foreign judgment “is enforceable in the same manner and is subject to the same procedures” as a judgment issued by an Arizona court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.