A. The operator of a motor vehicle who knowingly fails or refuses to bring the operator's motor vehicle to a stop after being given a visual or audible signal or instruction by a peace officer or duly authorized agent of a traffic enforcement agency is guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor.
B. After stopping as required by subsection A of this section, the operator of a motor vehicle who fails or refuses to exhibit the operator's driver license as required by section 28-3169 or a driver who is not licensed and who fails or refuses to provide evidence of the driver's identity on request is guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor. The evidence of identity that is presented shall contain all of the following information:
1. The driver's full name.
2. The driver's date of birth.
3. The driver's residence address.
4. A brief physical description of the driver, including the driver's sex, weight, height and eye and hair color.
5. The driver's signature.
C. A person other than the driver of a motor vehicle who fails or refuses to provide evidence of the person's identity to a peace officer or a duly authorized agent of a traffic enforcement agency on request, when such officer or agent has reasonable cause to believe the person has committed a violation of this title, is guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor.
D. A peace officer or duly authorized agent of a traffic enforcement agency may give the signal or instruction required by subsection A of this section by hand, emergency light, voice, whistle or siren.
E. A person shall not be convicted of a violation of subsection B of this section if the person provided evidence of identity required by subsection B, paragraphs 1 through 5 of this section and produces to the court a legible driver license or an authorized duplicate of the license that is issued to the person and that was valid at the time the violation of subsection B of this section occurred.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
16
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2022 · leading case:
In Re Moises L., 18 P.3d 1231 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001).
In Re Moises L., 18 P.3d 1231 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 16× “We answer two questions on appeal: (1) whether a suspect’s verbal responses to identifying questions may constitute the evidence of identity required under A.R.S. § 28-1595(B); and (2) whether A.R.”
State v. FIIHR, 211 P.3d 13 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 11× “On appeal, Fiihr contends the tidal court erred by failing sua sponte to instruct the jury on what he claims is a lesser-included offense — “[fjailure to stop” under A.R.S. § 28-1595(A). Because he failed to object to the instructions given below or to request a…”
State v. Hernandez, 399 P.3d 115 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 8× “It posits that an objective viewing of the failure to stop and purposeful turn onto private property “gave the deputies probable cause to arrest him for unlawful flight.”
State v. Bonillas, 3 P.3d 1016 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 9× “132, § 3, which was renumbered and amended as the current version of § 28-1595. See 1996 Ariz. Sess. Laws, ch.”
United States v. Roseboro, 551 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2009).
“"); Ariz. Rev.Stat. § 28-1595(A) ("The operator of a motor vehicle who knowingly fails or refuses to bring the operator's motor vehicle to a stop after being given a visual or audible signal or instruction by a peace officer or duly authorized agent of a traffic enforcement…”
State v. Lopez, 10 P.3d 1207 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).
· cites it 3× “See A.R.S. § 28-1595(B) (failure or refusal to exhibit driver's license is a class 2 misdemeanor); see also A.”
Way v. State, 67 P.3d 1232 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 2× “§ 28-3169(A), and because failure to do so constitutes a misdemeanor and may subject such a person to arrest, see A.R.S. § 28-1595(B); State v. Bonillas, 197 Ariz.”
Bressi v. Ford, 575 F.3d 891 (9th Cir. 2009).
“After about four hours of intermittent exchanges between the Officers and Bressi, during which time Bressi was handcuffed and taken to the side of the road, the Officers cited Bressi for violating two Arizona laws: Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 28-1595(B)(failure to provide a driver’s…”
State of Arizona v. Anthony Lito Hernandez, 417 P.3d 207 (Ariz. 2018).
· cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 28-1595(A) ("The operator of a motor vehicle who knowingly fails or refuses to bring the operator's motor vehicle to a stop after being given a visual or audible signal or instruction by a peace officer .”
John E. Shaffer Enter. v. City of Yuma, 904 P.2d 1252 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995).
“section 28-1595. The Arizona Constitution provides that monies allocated from the Arizona Highway User Revenue Fund to incorporated cities are to be used by them solely for highway and street purposes including costs of right-of-way, acquisitions and expenses relating thereto,…”
State v. Akins, 75 P.3d 718 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 30× “The Maricopa County Attorney’s office filed three drug charges against Akins stemming from the arrest.”
State of Arizona v. William John Fiihr (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 10× “1 He was sentenced to a partially mitigated prison term of 4.5 years. On appeal, Fiihr contends the trial court erred by failing sua sponte to instruct the jury on what he claims is a lesser-included offense—“[f]ailure to stop” under A.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-1595(0) — 1 case
State v. Akins, 75 P.3d 718 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).
“The Maricopa County Attorney’s office filed three drug charges against Akins stemming from the arrest.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-1595(A) — 6 cases
State v. FIIHR, 211 P.3d 13 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
“On appeal, Fiihr contends the tidal court erred by failing sua sponte to instruct the jury on what he claims is a lesser-included offense — “[fjailure to stop” under A.R.S. § 28-1595(A). Because he failed to object to the instructions given below or to request a…”
State v. Hernandez, 399 P.3d 115 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
“It posits that an objective viewing of the failure to stop and purposeful turn onto private property “gave the deputies probable cause to arrest him for unlawful flight.”
United States v. Roseboro, 551 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2009).
“"); Ariz. Rev.Stat. § 28-1595(A) ("The operator of a motor vehicle who knowingly fails or refuses to bring the operator's motor vehicle to a stop after being given a visual or audible signal or instruction by a peace officer or duly authorized agent of a traffic enforcement…”
State of Arizona v. Anthony Lito Hernandez, 417 P.3d 207 (Ariz. 2018).
“See A.R.S. § 28-1595(A) ("The operator of a motor vehicle who knowingly fails or refuses to bring the operator's motor vehicle to a stop after being given a visual or audible signal or instruction by a peace officer .”
State of Arizona v. William John Fiihr (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
“1 He was sentenced to a partially mitigated prison term of 4.5 years. On appeal, Fiihr contends the trial court erred by failing sua sponte to instruct the jury on what he claims is a lesser-included offense—“[f]ailure to stop” under A.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-1595(B) — 7 cases
In Re Moises L., 18 P.3d 1231 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001).
“We answer two questions on appeal: (1) whether a suspect’s verbal responses to identifying questions may constitute the evidence of identity required under A.R.S. § 28-1595(B); and (2) whether A.R.”
State v. Bonillas, 3 P.3d 1016 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
“132, § 3, which was renumbered and amended as the current version of § 28-1595. See 1996 Ariz. Sess. Laws, ch.”
State v. Lopez, 10 P.3d 1207 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).
“See A.R.S. § 28-1595(B) (failure or refusal to exhibit driver's license is a class 2 misdemeanor); see also A.”
Way v. State, 67 P.3d 1232 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).
“§ 28-3169(A), and because failure to do so constitutes a misdemeanor and may subject such a person to arrest, see A.R.S. § 28-1595(B); State v. Bonillas, 197 Ariz.”
Bressi v. Ford, 575 F.3d 891 (9th Cir. 2009).
“After about four hours of intermittent exchanges between the Officers and Bressi, during which time Bressi was handcuffed and taken to the side of the road, the Officers cited Bressi for violating two Arizona laws: Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 28-1595(B)(failure to provide a driver’s…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-1595(C) — 1 case
State v. Akins, 75 P.3d 718 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).
“The Maricopa County Attorney’s office filed three drug charges against Akins stemming from the arrest.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-1595(D) — 2 cases
State v. FIIHR, 211 P.3d 13 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
“On appeal, Fiihr contends the tidal court erred by failing sua sponte to instruct the jury on what he claims is a lesser-included offense — “[fjailure to stop” under A.R.S. § 28-1595(A). Because he failed to object to the instructions given below or to request a…”
State of Arizona v. William John Fiihr (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
“1 He was sentenced to a partially mitigated prison term of 4.5 years. On appeal, Fiihr contends the trial court erred by failing sua sponte to instruct the jury on what he claims is a lesser-included offense—“[f]ailure to stop” under A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.