Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 28
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-2326 (2026)

Acceptance of rights and privileges; appointment for service of process

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. The rights and privileges conferred by sections 28-2321, 28-2322, 28-2323 and 28-2324 and section 28-3152, subsection A, paragraphs 4 and 5 are deemed accepted, and the acceptance is evidenced, by a nonresident:

1. If the nonresident or the nonresident's agent operates a motor vehicle on a public highway under the provisions of and the conditions imposed by sections 28-2321, 28-2322, 28-2323 and 28-2324 and section 28-3152, subsection A, paragraphs 4 and 5.

2. If the nonresident or the nonresident's agent operates a motor vehicle on a public highway other than under the provisions of sections 28-2321, 28-2322, 28-2323 and 28-2324 and section 28-3152, subsection A, paragraphs 4 and 5.

3. If a motor vehicle that is owned by a nonresident is operated on a public highway with the owner's express or implied permission under circumstances that render a resident motor vehicle owner liable for damages to person or property caused by the operation.

B. Acceptance of the rights and privileges stated in subsection A of this section constitutes the appointment of the director by the nonresident as the nonresident's true and lawful attorney on whom process may be served in an action against the nonresident that arises from an accident or collision involving the nonresident, the nonresident's agent or any other person operating a motor vehicle owned by the nonresident with the nonresident's express or implied permission on a public highway.

C. This section also applies to a nonresident defendant who was a resident of this state at the time of the accident or occurrence that gave rise to the action.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2023 · leading case: Panzino v. City of Phoenix, 990 P.2d 654 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Panzino v. City of Phoenix, 990 P.2d 654 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “The process server, concluding that Karlin had left the state, attempted service on the Superintendent of the Arizona Motor Vehicle Department pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 28-2326 and 28-2327 (then enumerated as §§ 28-502 and 28-503), delivering the summons and complaint to the…”
Ramos v. Pierce (D. Ariz. 2023). · cites it 4× “” A.R.S. § 28-2326(A)(3). Acceptance results 8 in “the appointment of the director2 by the nonresident” to accept services of process in 9 proceedings that arise from a collision involving: (1) the nonresident; or (2) “the 10 nonresident’s agent or any other person operating a…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-2326(A)(3) — 1 case
Ramos v. Pierce (D. Ariz. 2023). “” A.R.S. § 28-2326(A)(3). Acceptance results 8 in “the appointment of the director2 by the nonresident” to accept services of process in 9 proceedings that arise from a collision involving: (1) the nonresident; or (2) “the 10 nonresident’s agent or any other person operating a…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-2326(B) — 1 case
Ramos v. Pierce (D. Ariz. 2023). “” A.R.S. § 28-2326(A)(3). Acceptance results 8 in “the appointment of the director2 by the nonresident” to accept services of process in 9 proceedings that arise from a collision involving: (1) the nonresident; or (2) “the 10 nonresident’s agent or any other person operating a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.