Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 29-1004 (2026)
Supplemental principles of law
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A. Unless displaced by particular provisions of this chapter, the principles of law and equity supplement this chapter.
B. If an obligation to pay interest arises under this chapter and the rate is not specified, the rate is that specified in section 44-1201.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2006–2006 · leading case: Turley v. Ethington, 146 P.3d 1282 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006).
Turley v. Ethington, 146 P.3d 1282 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006). “A.R.S. § 29-1004(A). The Ethingtons, however, further argue that had the legislature intended to exclude partnership agreements calling for the transfer of real property between partners from the statute of frauds it would have explicitly done so.”
Turley v. Ethington (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006). “A.R.S. § 29-1004(A). The Ethingtons, however, further argue that had the legislature intended to exclude partnership agreements calling for the transfer of real property between partners from the statute of frauds it would have explicitly done so.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 29-1004(A) — 2 cases
Turley v. Ethington, 146 P.3d 1282 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006). “A.R.S. § 29-1004(A). The Ethingtons, however, further argue that had the legislature intended to exclude partnership agreements calling for the transfer of real property between partners from the statute of frauds it would have explicitly done so.”
Turley v. Ethington (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006). “A.R.S. § 29-1004(A). The Ethingtons, however, further argue that had the legislature intended to exclude partnership agreements calling for the transfer of real property between partners from the statute of frauds it would have explicitly done so.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.