Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 32
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1129 (2026)

Apprenticeship programs; certificate of completion; filing with registrar

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

32-1129. Apprenticeship programs; certificate of completion; filing with registrar

A. If a person completes a United States department of labor-approved or a department of economic security-approved apprenticeship program in a construction trade, the person or apprenticeship program sponsor may file the certificate of completion and any related updates to the certificate, including documentation for completed continuing education courses, with the registrar in a manner prescribed by the registrar.

B. The registrar shall maintain all documents that are filed pursuant to this section for ten years.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2021 · leading case: RSP Architects, Ltd. v. Five Star Dev. Resort Communities, LLC, 306 P.3d 93 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
RSP Architects, Ltd. v. Five Star Dev. Resort Communities, LLC, 306 P.3d 93 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 8× “” A.R.S. § 32-1129(A)(2). The question, therefore, is whether the contract here is a “construction contract” within the meaning of the statute.”
Stonecreek Bldg. Co., Inc. v. Shure, 162 P.3d 675 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 3× “¶ 9 The Prompt Pay Act, A.R.S. §§ 32-1129 to -1129.06, provides in part that an owner shall make progress payments to a contractor “on the basis of a duly certified and approved billing or estimate of the work performed and the materials supplied during the preceding thirty day…”
Saban v. Ador, 418 P.3d 1066 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “2013) (phrase "relating to" in Prompt Payment Act, A.R.S. § 32-1129(A)(1) (2018), does not encompass every relationship or connection with the referenced term: "Common sense .”
Zumar v. Caymus, 418 P.3d 936 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 17× “See A.R.S. § 32-1129 through -1129.07. We agree.”
SK Builders, Inc. v. Smith, 436 P.3d 519 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “STARING, Presiding Judge: ¶1 Michael and Sandi Smith appeal the trial court's judgment that they violated Arizona's Prompt Pay Act ("APPA"), A.R.S. §§ 32-1129 to 32-1129.07, by failing to pay or object in writing to a payment application submitted to them for construction of…”
Grady's v. All. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 3× “See A.R.S. § 32-1129. ¶20 Because there is no dispute that (1) the owner of the contract is Yavapai County; (2) Yavapai County is a political subdivision of this state; and (3) Alliance and Grady’s Excavating entered the Subcontract for the construction of the Verde Valley…”
Trap-Zap v. Facilitysource (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 3× “”) section 32-1129. The court granted FSNE’s motion to dismiss the Prompt Payment claim, ruling the Act did not apply to work performed outside of Arizona.”
York Mech. Corp. Vs. Kinney Constr. Servs., Inc. (l-1229-19, Hudson Cnty. & Statewide) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2021). “" Thus, it was irrelevant whether the BSA was signed because the forum selection clause was 1 This section of the BSA references the former citation of the Arizona's Prompt Payment Act, which is A.R.S § 32-1129 to -1129.07. A-4654-18 6 incorporated by reference in the Purchase…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1129(A) — 1 case
Zumar v. Caymus, 418 P.3d 936 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “See A.R.S. § 32-1129 through -1129.07. We agree.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1129(A)(1) — 1 case
Saban v. Ador, 418 P.3d 1066 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018). “2013) (phrase "relating to" in Prompt Payment Act, A.R.S. § 32-1129(A)(1) (2018), does not encompass every relationship or connection with the referenced term: "Common sense .”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1129(A)(2) — 2 cases
RSP Architects, Ltd. v. Five Star Dev. Resort Communities, LLC, 306 P.3d 93 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). “” A.R.S. § 32-1129(A)(2). The question, therefore, is whether the contract here is a “construction contract” within the meaning of the statute.”
Zumar v. Caymus, 418 P.3d 936 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “See A.R.S. § 32-1129 through -1129.07. We agree.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1129(A)(4) — 1 case
Zumar v. Caymus, 418 P.3d 936 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “See A.R.S. § 32-1129 through -1129.07. We agree.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1129(A)(6) — 2 cases
Zumar v. Caymus, 418 P.3d 936 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “See A.R.S. § 32-1129 through -1129.07. We agree.”
Trap-Zap v. Facilitysource (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019). “”) section 32-1129. The court granted FSNE’s motion to dismiss the Prompt Payment claim, ruling the Act did not apply to work performed outside of Arizona.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1129(A)(l) — 1 case
RSP Architects, Ltd. v. Five Star Dev. Resort Communities, LLC, 306 P.3d 93 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). “” A.R.S. § 32-1129(A)(2). The question, therefore, is whether the contract here is a “construction contract” within the meaning of the statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.