32-1133.01. Administrative recovery; statute of limitations
A. Notwithstanding any other provision in this chapter, if a contractor license has been revoked or suspended as a result of an order to remedy a violation of this chapter, the registrar may order payment from the residential contractors' recovery fund to remedy the violation.
B. The registrar must serve the contractor with a notice setting forth the amount claimed or to be awarded.
C. If the contractor contests the amount or propriety of the payment, the contractor must respond in writing within ten days after the date of service by requesting a hearing to determine the amount or propriety of the payment. The contractor's failure to respond in writing within ten days after the date of service may be deemed a waiver by the contractor of the right to contest the amount claimed or to be awarded.
D. Service of the notice required by subsection B of this section may be made by personal service to the contractor or by mailing a copy of the notice by certified mail with postage prepaid to the contractor's latest address of record on file in the registrar's office.
E. If service is made by certified mail, it is effective five days after the notice is mailed. Except as provided in section 41-1092.08, subsection H, the contractor or claimant may seek judicial review of the registrar's final award pursuant to title 12, chapter 7, article 6.
F. A claimant to the residential contractors' recovery fund pursuant to this section must show that the claimant has proceeded against any existing bond covering the residential contractor.
G. A claim for payment from the residential contractor's recovery fund must be submitted within two years after all proceedings, reviews and appeals connected with the registrar's final order terminate.
Notes of Decisions
Flanigan v. Arizona registrar/r&c (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 27× “A.R.S. § 32-1133.01 ¶8 A claimant that files a complaint with the ROC resulting in either the suspension or revocation of the contractor’s licenses can access the Recovery Fund through an administrative process and does not have to file a civil suit against the contractor.”
Advantage Pool v. Miles (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026).
· cites it 14× “A.R.S. § 32-1133.01(F). The ROC administers 4 ADVANTAGE POOL v.”
1st Choice v. White (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 32-1133.01(A).1 The outcome of the civil suit, which was premised and turned on whether 1st Choice had a valid license to perform the contracted work, did not affect that eligibility.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1133.01(A) — 2 cases
Flanigan v. Arizona registrar/r&c (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
“A.R.S. § 32-1133.01 ¶8 A claimant that files a complaint with the ROC resulting in either the suspension or revocation of the contractor’s licenses can access the Recovery Fund through an administrative process and does not have to file a civil suit against the contractor.”
1st Choice v. White (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020).
“A.R.S. § 32-1133.01(A).1 The outcome of the civil suit, which was premised and turned on whether 1st Choice had a valid license to perform the contracted work, did not affect that eligibility.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1133.01(F) — 2 cases
Flanigan v. Arizona registrar/r&c (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
“A.R.S. § 32-1133.01 ¶8 A claimant that files a complaint with the ROC resulting in either the suspension or revocation of the contractor’s licenses can access the Recovery Fund through an administrative process and does not have to file a civil suit against the contractor.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1133.01(G) — 1 case
Flanigan v. Arizona registrar/r&c (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
“A.R.S. § 32-1133.01 ¶8 A claimant that files a complaint with the ROC resulting in either the suspension or revocation of the contractor’s licenses can access the Recovery Fund through an administrative process and does not have to file a civil suit against the contractor.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.