Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 32
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1297.07 (2026)

Discipline; procedure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. After a hearing pursuant to title 41, chapter 6, article 10, the board may suspend or revoke the license issued to a person under this article or censure or place on probation any person for any of the causes set forth as grounds for censure, probation, suspension or revocation in section 32-1263.

B. The board on its own motion may investigate any evidence which appears to show the existence of any of the causes set forth in section 32-1263.  The board shall investigate the report under oath of any person which appears to show the existence of any of the causes set forth in section 32-1263.  Any person reporting pursuant to this section who provides the information in good faith shall not be subject to liability for civil damages as a result.

C. Except as provided in section 41-1092.08, subsection H, final decisions of the board are subject to judicial review pursuant to title 12, chapter 7, article 6.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1982–1994 · leading case: Berrett v. Purser & Edwards, 876 P.2d 367 (Utah 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Berrett v. Purser & Edwards, 876 P.2d 367 (Utah 1994). · cites it 2× “'" See A.R.S. §§ 32-1297.07(A)(1) and 32-1201(10)(n).”
Caldwell v. Arizona State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 670 P.2d 1220 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “Grounds for disciplinary action against denturists are outlined in A.R.S. § 32-1297.07 (Supp.1982). Therefore, any investigation, informal interview, competence examination, or formal proceedings which the Board initiates pursuant to A.”
Kenneth A. Vinall, D.D.S., P.C. v. Hoffman, 651 P.2d 850 (Ariz. 1982). · cites it 2× “’ ” See A.R.S. §§ 32-1297.07(A)(l) and 32-1201(10)(n).”
Caldwell v. Arizona State Bd. of Dental Exam., 670 P.2d 1220 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 4× “Grounds for disciplinary action against denturists are outlined in A.R.S. § 32-1297.07 (Supp. 1982). Therefore, any investigation, informal interview, competence examination, or formal proceedings which the Board initiates pursuant to A.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1297.07(A)(1) — 1 case
Berrett v. Purser & Edwards, 876 P.2d 367 (Utah 1994). “'" See A.R.S. §§ 32-1297.07(A)(1) and 32-1201(10)(n).”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1297.07(A)(l) — 2 cases
Kenneth A. Vinall, D.D.S., P.C. v. Hoffman, 651 P.2d 850 (Ariz. 1982). “’ ” See A.R.S. §§ 32-1297.07(A)(l) and 32-1201(10)(n).”
Berrett v. Purser & Edwards, 876 P.2d 367 (Utah 1994). “'" See A.R.S. §§ 32-1297.07(A)(1) and 32-1201(10)(n).”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1297.07(B) — 1 case
Caldwell v. Arizona State Bd. of Dental Exam., 670 P.2d 1220 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983). “Grounds for disciplinary action against denturists are outlined in A.R.S. § 32-1297.07 (Supp. 1982). Therefore, any investigation, informal interview, competence examination, or formal proceedings which the Board initiates pursuant to A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.