Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 32
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1407 (2026)

Jurisdiction arbitration panel

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. When the board receives a complaint concerning a physician who is also licensed pursuant to chapter 29 of this title, the board shall immediately notify the board of homeopathic and integrated medicine examiners.  If the boards disagree and if both boards continue to claim jurisdiction over the dual licensee, an arbitration panel shall decide jurisdiction pursuant to section 32-2907, subsections B, C, D and E.

B. If the licensing boards decide without resorting to arbitration which board or boards shall conduct the investigation, the board or boards conducting the investigation shall transmit all investigation materials, findings and conclusions to the other board with which the physician is licensed. The board or boards shall review this information to determine if disciplinary action shall be taken against the physician.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1993–1993 · leading case: Bigelsen v. Arizona State Bd. of Med. Examiners, 853 P.2d 1133 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bigelsen v. Arizona State Bd. of Med. Examiners, 853 P.2d 1133 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 18× “section 32-1407, its decision does not preclude BOMEX from reviewing the record to determine whether it has grounds to discipline Dr.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1407(A) — 1 case
Bigelsen v. Arizona State Bd. of Med. Examiners, 853 P.2d 1133 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993). “section 32-1407, its decision does not preclude BOMEX from reviewing the record to determine whether it has grounds to discipline Dr.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1407(B) — 1 case
Bigelsen v. Arizona State Bd. of Med. Examiners, 853 P.2d 1133 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993). “section 32-1407, its decision does not preclude BOMEX from reviewing the record to determine whether it has grounds to discipline Dr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.