Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 32
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-554 (2026)

Required display

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Schools shall display the following in a conspicuous location:

1. The current school license.

2. The current licenses of instructors teaching in the school.

3. The latest inspection sheet.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1959–1979 · leading case: Phillips v. Arizona Bd. of Regents, 601 P.2d 596 (Ariz. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Phillips v. Arizona Bd. of Regents, 601 P.2d 596 (Ariz. 1979). · cites it 4× “In that case plaintiff had not filed a bond, as required by then A.R.S. § 32-554(F), in order to appeal to the Superior Court from a decision of the Board of Beauty Culturists Examiners.”
Knape v. Brown, 342 P.2d 195 (Ariz. 1959). · cites it 3× “” The Board filed an answer and a motion to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the trial court lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action. Specifically it was urged (a) that no appeal would lie under the Administrative Review Act, A.”
Sarwark v. Thorneycroft, 596 P.2d 1173 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 2× “§ 32-2082(C); Cosmetologists, A.R.S. § 32-554; Contractors, A.R.S. § 32-1159; and Accountants, A.”
Meyer v. Campbell, 480 P.2d 22 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1971). “Other code sections provide for review in accordance with Title 12, Ch. 7, Art. 6: 1 A.R.S. § 32-2195.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-554(F) — 1 case
Phillips v. Arizona Bd. of Regents, 601 P.2d 596 (Ariz. 1979). “In that case plaintiff had not filed a bond, as required by then A.R.S. § 32-554(F), in order to appeal to the Superior Court from a decision of the Board of Beauty Culturists Examiners.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.