Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2159 (2026)

Abortion; gestational age; violation; classification; unprofessional conduct; civil relief; statute of limitations

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

36-2159. Abortion; gestational age; violation; classification; unprofessional conduct; civil relief; statute of limitations

A. Except in a medical emergency, a person shall not perform, induce or attempt to perform or induce an abortion unless the physician or the referring physician has first made a determination of the probable gestational age of the unborn child. In making that determination, the physician or referring physician shall make any inquiries of the pregnant woman and perform or cause to be performed all medical examinations, imaging studies and tests as a reasonably prudent physician in the community, knowledgeable about the medical facts and conditions of both the woman and the unborn child involved, would consider necessary to perform and consider in making an accurate diagnosis with respect to gestational age.

B. Except in a medical emergency, a person shall not knowingly perform, induce or attempt to perform or induce an abortion on a pregnant woman if the probable gestational age of her unborn child has been determined to be at least twenty weeks.

C. A person who knowingly violates this section commits a class 1 misdemeanor.

D. A physician who knowingly violates this section commits an act of unprofessional conduct and is subject to license suspension or revocation pursuant to title 32, chapter 13 or 17.

E. In addition to other remedies available under the common or statutory law of this state, any of the following individuals may file a civil action to obtain appropriate relief for a violation of this section:

1. A woman on whom an abortion has been performed in violation of this section.

2. The father of the unborn child if the father is married to the mother at the time she received the abortion, unless the pregnancy resulted from the father's criminal conduct.

3. The maternal grandparents of the unborn child if the mother was not at least eighteen years of age at the time of the abortion, unless the pregnancy resulted from either of the maternal grandparent's criminal conduct.

F. A civil action filed pursuant to subsection E of this section shall be brought in the superior court in the county in which the woman on whom the abortion was performed resides.  Relief pursuant to this subsection includes the following:

1. Money damages for all psychological, emotional and physical injuries resulting from the violation of this section.

2. Statutory damages in an amount equal to five thousand dollars or three times the cost of the abortion, whichever is greater.

3. Reasonable attorney fees and costs.

G. A civil action brought pursuant to this section must be initiated within six years after the violation occurred.

H. A woman on whom an abortion is performed or induced in violation of this section may not be prosecuted under this section or for conspiracy to commit a violation of this section.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2024 · leading case: Paul Isaacson v. Tom Horne, 716 F.3d 1213 (9th Cir. 2013).
Paul Isaacson v. Tom Horne, 716 F.3d 1213 (9th Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2159 . Arizona law defines “medical emergency” as: a condition that, on the basis of the physician’s good faith clinical judgment, so complicates the medical condition of a pregnant woman as to necessitate the immediate abortion of her pregnancy to avert…”
Isaacson v. Horne, 884 F. Supp. 2d 961 (D. Ariz. 2012). · cites it 7× “The statutory scheme also gives standing to certain individuals to bring civil actions for violations of section 36-2159. H.B. 2036, 50th Leg., 2d Reg.”
Planned Parenthood v. Kristin mayes/hazelrigg (Ariz. 2024). · cites it 3× “For that reason—as the legislature undoubtedly knew when it enacted § 36-2322(B)—the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals invalidated A.R.S. § 36-2159, which banned elective abortions after twenty weeks.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2159(B) — 1 case
Isaacson v. Horne, 884 F. Supp. 2d 961 (D. Ariz. 2012). “The statutory scheme also gives standing to certain individuals to bring civil actions for violations of section 36-2159. H.B. 2036, 50th Leg., 2d Reg.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2159(C) — 1 case
Isaacson v. Horne, 884 F. Supp. 2d 961 (D. Ariz. 2012). “The statutory scheme also gives standing to certain individuals to bring civil actions for violations of section 36-2159. H.B. 2036, 50th Leg., 2d Reg.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2159(E) — 1 case
Isaacson v. Horne, 884 F. Supp. 2d 961 (D. Ariz. 2012). “The statutory scheme also gives standing to certain individuals to bring civil actions for violations of section 36-2159. H.B. 2036, 50th Leg., 2d Reg.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.