Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 36
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

36-2801. Definitions

(Caution:  1998 Prop. 105 applies)

 

In this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:

1. "Allowable amount of marijuana":

(a) With respect to a qualifying patient, means:

(i) Two and one-half ounces of usable marijuana.

(ii) If the qualifying patient's registry identification card states that the qualifying patient is authorized to cultivate marijuana, twelve marijuana plants contained in an enclosed, locked facility, except that the plants are not required to be in an enclosed, locked facility if the plants are being transported because the qualifying patient is moving.

(b) With respect to a designated caregiver, for each patient assisted by the designated caregiver under this chapter, means:

(i) Two and one-half ounces of usable marijuana.

(ii) If the designated caregiver's registry identification card provides that the designated caregiver is authorized to cultivate marijuana, twelve marijuana plants contained in an enclosed, locked facility, except that the plants are not required to be in an enclosed, locked facility if the plants are being transported because the designated caregiver is moving.

(c) Does not include marijuana that is incidental to medical use, but is not usable marijuana.

2. "Cardholder" means a qualifying patient, a designated caregiver, a nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary agent or a independent third-party laboratory agent who has been issued and possesses a valid registry identification card.

3. "Debilitating medical condition" means one or more of the following:

(a) Cancer, glaucoma, positive status for human immunodeficiency virus, acquired immune deficiency syndrome, hepatitis C, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Crohn's disease or agitation of Alzheimer's disease or the treatment of these conditions.

(b) A chronic or debilitating disease or medical condition or its treatment that produces one or more of the following:

(i) Cachexia or wasting syndrome.

(ii) Severe and chronic pain.

(iii) Severe nausea.

(iv) Seizures, including those characteristic of epilepsy.

(v) Severe and persistent muscle spasms, including those characteristic of multiple sclerosis.

(c) Any other medical condition or its treatment added by the department pursuant to section 36-2801.01.

4. "Department" means the department of health services or its successor agency.

5. "Designated caregiver" means a person who:

(a) Is at least twenty-one years of age.

(b) Has agreed to assist with a patient's medical use of marijuana.

(c) Has not been convicted of an excluded felony offense.

(d) Assists not more than five qualifying patients with the medical use of marijuana.

(e) May receive reimbursement for actual costs incurred in assisting a registered qualifying patient's medical use of marijuana if the registered designated caregiver is connected to the registered qualifying patient through the department's registration process. The designated caregiver may not be paid any fee or compensation for service as a caregiver. Payment for costs under this subdivision does not constitute an offense under title 13, chapter 34 or under title 36, chapter 27, article 4.

6. "Enclosed, locked facility" means a closet, room, greenhouse or other enclosed area that is equipped with locks or other security devices that permit access only by a cardholder.

7. "Excluded felony offense" means:

(a) A violent crime as defined in section 13-901.03, subsection B, that was classified as a felony in the jurisdiction where the person was convicted.

(b) A violation of a state or federal controlled substance law that was classified as a felony in the jurisdiction where the person was convicted but does not include:

(i) An offense for which the sentence, including any term of probation, incarceration or supervised release, was completed ten or more years earlier.

(ii) An offense involving conduct that would be immune from arrest, prosecution or penalty under section 36-2811, except that the conduct occurred before December 14, 2010 or was prosecuted by an authority other than the state of Arizona.

8. "Independent third-party laboratory" means an entity that has a national or international accreditation and that is certified by the department to analyze marijuana cultivated for medical use.

9. "Independent third-party laboratory agent" means an owner, employee or volunteer of a certified independent third-party laboratory who is at least twenty-one years of age and who has not been convicted of an excluded felony offense.

10. "Marijuana" means all parts of any plant of the genus cannabis whether growing or not, and the seeds of such plant.

11. "Medical use" means the acquisition, possession, cultivation, manufacture, use, administration, delivery, transfer or transportation of marijuana or paraphernalia relating to the administration of marijuana to treat or alleviate a registered qualifying patient's debilitating medical condition or symptoms associated with the patient's debilitating medical condition.

12. "Nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary" means a not-for-profit entity that acquires, possesses, cultivates, manufactures, delivers, transfers, transports, supplies, sells or dispenses marijuana or related supplies and educational materials to cardholders. A nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary may receive payment for all expenses incurred in its operation.

13. "Nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary agent" means a principal officer, board member, employee or volunteer of a nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary who is at least twenty-one years of age and has not been convicted of an excluded felony offense.

14. "Physician" means a doctor of medicine who holds a valid and existing license to practice medicine pursuant to title 32, chapter 13 or its successor, a doctor of osteopathic medicine who holds a valid and existing license to practice osteopathic medicine pursuant to title 32, chapter 17 or its successor, a naturopathic physician who holds a valid and existing license to practice naturopathic medicine pursuant to title 32, chapter 14 or its successor or a homeopathic physician who holds a valid and existing license to practice homeopathic medicine pursuant to title 32, chapter 29 or its successor.

15. "Qualifying patient" means a person who has been diagnosed by a physician as having a debilitating medical condition.

16. "Registry identification card" means a document issued by the department that identifies a person as a registered qualifying patient, a registered designated caregiver, a registered nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary agent or a registered independent third-party laboratory agent.

17. "Usable marijuana":

(a) Means the dried flowers of the marijuana plant, and any mixture or preparation thereof.

(b) Does not include:

(i) The seeds, stalks and roots of the plant.

(ii) The weight of any non-marijuana ingredients combined with marijuana and prepared for consumption as food or drink.

18. "Verification system" means a secure, password-protected, web-based system that is established and maintained by the department and that is available to law enforcement personnel and nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary agents on a twenty-four-hour basis for verifying registry identification cards.

19. "Visiting qualifying patient" means a person:

(a) Who is not a resident of Arizona or who has been a resident of Arizona less than thirty days.

(b) Who has been diagnosed with a debilitating medical condition by a person who is licensed with authority to prescribe drugs to humans in the state of the person's residence or, in the case of a person who has been a resident of Arizona less than thirty days, the state of the person's former residence.

20. "Written certification" means a document dated and signed by a physician, stating that in the physician's professional opinion the patient is likely to receive therapeutic or palliative benefit from the medical use of marijuana to treat or alleviate the patient's debilitating medical condition or symptoms associated with the debilitating medical condition.  The physician must:

(a) Specify the qualifying patient's debilitating medical condition in the written certification.

(b) Sign and date the written certification only in the course of a physician-patient relationship after the physician has completed a full assessment of the qualifying patient's medical history.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 72 cases (14 in the last 5 years), 2013–2025 · leading case: State of Arizona v. Rodney Christopher Jones, 440 P.3d 1139 (Ariz. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of Arizona v. Rodney Christopher Jones, 440 P.3d 1139 (Ariz. 2019). · cites it 17× “) Section 36-2801(8) provides the definition of marijuana, and nothing in § 36-2801(1) or (15) alters its meaning. Rather, by its own language, the limitation in § 36-2801(1) and (15) pertains only to the amount of marijuana the patient can legally possess, not the type or form…”
Parsons v. Arizona Dep't of Health Servs., 395 P.3d 709 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 12× “OPINION HOWE, Judge: ¶ 1 This appeal is from the superior court’s ruling affirming the Arizona Department of Health Services’s (“DHS”) order revoking Jimmy Parsons’s caregiver registration card under the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act, A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through -2810 (“AMMA”),…”
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II, 373 P.3d 549 (Ariz. 2016). · cites it 7× “CHIEF JUSTICE BALES, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 Here we consider whether the odor of marijuana suffices to establish probable cause for issuance of a search warrant, given the adoption of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (“AMMA”), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 2819. We hold that it…”
Whitmire v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 359 F. Supp. 3d 761 (D. Ariz. 2019). · cites it 6× “Plaintiff also contends that Defendant wrongfully terminated her in violation of the AEPA, A.R.S. § 23-1501(A)(3)(b), by firing her because of her positive drug screen in violation of the public policy set forth in A.”
State of Arizona v. Robert Gear, 372 P.3d 287 (Ariz. 2016). · cites it 6× “Arizona Medical Marijuana Act ¶ 2 Arizona voters enacted AMMA, A.R.S. § 36-2801 et seq., by ballot initiative in 2010 (Proposition 203).”
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II, 359 P.3d 1 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 21× “¶2 We address here the effect of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 36-2819, on determinations of probable cause.”
Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. Hon. hoggat/state, 347 P.3d 136 (Ariz. 2015). · cites it 5× “” A.R.S. § 36-2801(13), (14). The definition of “debilitating medical condition” includes a “chronic .”
Arizona Cannabis Nurses Ass'n v. Arizona Dep't of Health Servs., 392 P.3d 506 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 8× “) §§ 36-2801 through -2819 (2017). 2 DHS granted the petition, subject to certain conditions.”
State v. Okun, 296 P.3d 998 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 7× “” See A.R.S. § 36-2801(1) (defining “allowable amount”).”
State of Arizona v. Ian Harvey Cheatham, 375 P.3d 66 (Ariz. 2016). · cites it 2× “CHIEF JUSTICE BALES, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 We here consider whether, after passage of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (“AMMA”), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 2819, the odor of marijuana emanating from a vehicle establishes probable cause to believe the vehicle contains…”
State of Arizona v. Justin James Chase, 304 P.3d 1088 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 5× “¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner State of Arizona challenges the respondent judge’s ruling remanding the criminal action against Justin Chase to the grand jury and ordering that it be instructed on two possible “interpretations” of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA),…”
Montana Cannabis Indus. Ass'n v. State, 2016 MT 44 (Mont. 2016). · cites it 2× “(recreational); Ariz. Rev. Stat. §§ 36-2801 et seq. (medical); Cal.”
Show all 72 citing cases →
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(1) — 4 cases
State of Arizona v. Rodney Christopher Jones, 440 P.3d 1139 (Ariz. 2019). “) Section 36-2801(8) provides the definition of marijuana, and nothing in § 36-2801(1) or (15) alters its meaning. Rather, by its own language, the limitation in § 36-2801(1) and (15) pertains only to the amount of marijuana the patient can legally possess, not the type or form…”
State v. Okun, 296 P.3d 998 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). “” See A.R.S. § 36-2801(1) (defining “allowable amount”).”
State ex rel. Polk v. Hancock, 340 P.3d 380 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Abdi, 343 P.3d 921 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(1)(a) — 2 cases
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II, 359 P.3d 1 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015). “¶2 We address here the effect of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 36-2819, on determinations of probable cause.”
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(1)(a)(i) — 7 cases
State of Arizona v. Andre Lee Juwaun Maestas, 417 P.3d 774 (Ariz. 2018).
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II, 359 P.3d 1 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015). “¶2 We address here the effect of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 36-2819, on determinations of probable cause.”
State v. Jones, 424 P.3d 447 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Alter (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Valentin (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(1)(a)(ii) — 3 cases
Saguaro Healing LLC v. State of Arizona, 470 P.3d 636 (Ariz. 2020).
State of Arizona v. Jeremy Allen Matlock, 350 P.3d 835 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
State v. Alter (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(1)(b)(ii) — 3 cases
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II, 373 P.3d 549 (Ariz. 2016). “CHIEF JUSTICE BALES, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 Here we consider whether the odor of marijuana suffices to establish probable cause for issuance of a search warrant, given the adoption of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (“AMMA”), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 2819. We hold that it…”
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II, 359 P.3d 1 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015). “¶2 We address here the effect of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 36-2819, on determinations of probable cause.”
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(1)(c) — 1 case
State v. Alter (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(11) — 2 cases
State of Arizona v. Jeremy Allen Matlock, 350 P.3d 835 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
Holbrook Health v. State (Ariz. Ct. App. 2023).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(12) — 5 cases
Dobson v. McClennen, 361 P.3d 374 (Ariz. 2015).
Premium Leaf v. Adhs (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
Holbrook Health v. State (Ariz. Ct. App. 2023).
dobson/anderson v. Hon. mcclennen/mesa Prosecutor (Ariz. 2015).
dobson/anderson v. Hon. mcclennen/mesa Prosecutor (Ariz. 2015).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(13) — 9 cases
Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. Hon. hoggat/state, 347 P.3d 136 (Ariz. 2015). “” A.R.S. § 36-2801(13), (14). The definition of “debilitating medical condition” includes a “chronic .”
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II, 373 P.3d 549 (Ariz. 2016). “CHIEF JUSTICE BALES, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 Here we consider whether the odor of marijuana suffices to establish probable cause for issuance of a search warrant, given the adoption of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (“AMMA”), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 2819. We hold that it…”
Darrah v. Hon. mcclennen/mesa, 337 P.3d 550 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
Dobson v. McClennen, 337 P.3d 568 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Lohse, 431 P.3d 606 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(14) — 2 cases
Gersten v. Sun Pain Mgmt., P.L.L.C., 395 P.3d 310 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Kemmish, 418 P.3d 1087 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(15) — 4 cases
State of Arizona v. Rodney Christopher Jones, 440 P.3d 1139 (Ariz. 2019). “) Section 36-2801(8) provides the definition of marijuana, and nothing in § 36-2801(1) or (15) alters its meaning. Rather, by its own language, the limitation in § 36-2801(1) and (15) pertains only to the amount of marijuana the patient can legally possess, not the type or form…”
Saguaro Healing LLC v. State of Arizona, 470 P.3d 636 (Ariz. 2020).
State v. Jones, 424 P.3d 447 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Alter (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(16) — 2 cases
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II, 359 P.3d 1 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015). “¶2 We address here the effect of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 36-2819, on determinations of probable cause.”
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(17) — 4 cases
State v. Okun, 296 P.3d 998 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). “” See A.R.S. § 36-2801(1) (defining “allowable amount”).”
State v. Abdi, 343 P.3d 921 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
State v. Kemmish, 418 P.3d 1087 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Valentin (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(18) — 6 cases
State of Arizona v. Robert Gear, 372 P.3d 287 (Ariz. 2016). “Arizona Medical Marijuana Act ¶ 2 Arizona voters enacted AMMA, A.R.S. § 36-2801 et seq., by ballot initiative in 2010 (Proposition 203).”
State v. Gear, 339 P.3d 1034 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
Dobson v. McClennen, 361 P.3d 374 (Ariz. 2015).
Dobson v. McClennen, 337 P.3d 568 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. State of Arizona, 332 P.3d 587 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(18)(b) — 1 case
State v. Gear, 339 P.3d 1034 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(2) — 4 cases
State of Arizona v. Jeremy Allen Matlock, 350 P.3d 835 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
State v. Abdi, 343 P.3d 921 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
State of Arizona v. Liwski, 358 P.3d 605 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
Christopher H., Arxit B. v. Dcs (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(3) — 7 cases
Whitmire v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 359 F. Supp. 3d 761 (D. Ariz. 2019). “Plaintiff also contends that Defendant wrongfully terminated her in violation of the AEPA, A.R.S. § 23-1501(A)(3)(b), by firing her because of her positive drug screen in violation of the public policy set forth in A.”
State of Arizona v. Robert Gear, 372 P.3d 287 (Ariz. 2016). “Arizona Medical Marijuana Act ¶ 2 Arizona voters enacted AMMA, A.R.S. § 36-2801 et seq., by ballot initiative in 2010 (Proposition 203).”
Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. Hon. hoggat/state, 347 P.3d 136 (Ariz. 2015). “” A.R.S. § 36-2801(13), (14). The definition of “debilitating medical condition” includes a “chronic .”
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II, 359 P.3d 1 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015). “¶2 We address here the effect of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 36-2819, on determinations of probable cause.”
State v. Gear, 339 P.3d 1034 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(3)(a) — 2 cases
Arizona Cannabis Nurses Ass'n v. Arizona Dep't of Health Servs., 392 P.3d 506 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “) §§ 36-2801 through -2819 (2017). 2 DHS granted the petition, subject to certain conditions.”
Gersten v. Sun Pain Mgmt., P.L.L.C., 395 P.3d 310 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(3)(c) — 1 case
Arizona Cannabis Nurses Ass'n v. Arizona Dep't of Health Servs., 392 P.3d 506 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “) §§ 36-2801 through -2819 (2017). 2 DHS granted the petition, subject to certain conditions.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(4) — 5 cases
Parsons v. Arizona Dep't of Health Servs., 395 P.3d 709 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “OPINION HOWE, Judge: ¶ 1 This appeal is from the superior court’s ruling affirming the Arizona Department of Health Services’s (“DHS”) order revoking Jimmy Parsons’s caregiver registration card under the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act, A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through -2810 (“AMMA”),…”
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II, 359 P.3d 1 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015). “¶2 We address here the effect of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 36-2819, on determinations of probable cause.”
State v. Abdi, 343 P.3d 921 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
State of Arizona v. Liwski, 358 P.3d 605 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(5) — 2 cases
State of Arizona v. Jeremy Allen Matlock, 350 P.3d 835 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
State of Arizona v. Liwski, 358 P.3d 605 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(5)(b) — 1 case
Parsons v. Adohs (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(5)(c) — 3 cases
Parsons v. Arizona Dep't of Health Servs., 395 P.3d 709 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “OPINION HOWE, Judge: ¶ 1 This appeal is from the superior court’s ruling affirming the Arizona Department of Health Services’s (“DHS”) order revoking Jimmy Parsons’s caregiver registration card under the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act, A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through -2810 (“AMMA”),…”
Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. State of Arizona, 332 P.3d 587 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
Parsons v. Adohs (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(5)(e) — 1 case
State of Arizona v. Jeremy Allen Matlock, 350 P.3d 835 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(6) — 1 case
State v. Wyatt (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(7) — 4 cases
Parsons v. Arizona Dep't of Health Servs., 395 P.3d 709 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “OPINION HOWE, Judge: ¶ 1 This appeal is from the superior court’s ruling affirming the Arizona Department of Health Services’s (“DHS”) order revoking Jimmy Parsons’s caregiver registration card under the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act, A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through -2810 (“AMMA”),…”
Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. Hon. hoggat/state, 347 P.3d 136 (Ariz. 2015). “” A.R.S. § 36-2801(13), (14). The definition of “debilitating medical condition” includes a “chronic .”
Murro v. Ariz. Dep't of Health Servs., 442 P.3d 834 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. State of Arizona, 332 P.3d 587 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(7)(b) — 2 cases
Parsons v. Arizona Dep't of Health Servs., 395 P.3d 709 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “OPINION HOWE, Judge: ¶ 1 This appeal is from the superior court’s ruling affirming the Arizona Department of Health Services’s (“DHS”) order revoking Jimmy Parsons’s caregiver registration card under the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act, A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through -2810 (“AMMA”),…”
Murro v. Ariz. Dep't of Health Servs., 442 P.3d 834 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(7)(b)(i) — 2 cases
Parsons v. Arizona Dep't of Health Servs., 395 P.3d 709 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “OPINION HOWE, Judge: ¶ 1 This appeal is from the superior court’s ruling affirming the Arizona Department of Health Services’s (“DHS”) order revoking Jimmy Parsons’s caregiver registration card under the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act, A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through -2810 (“AMMA”),…”
Parsons v. Adohs (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(8) — 2 cases
State of Arizona v. Rodney Christopher Jones, 440 P.3d 1139 (Ariz. 2019). “) Section 36-2801(8) provides the definition of marijuana, and nothing in § 36-2801(1) or (15) alters its meaning. Rather, by its own language, the limitation in § 36-2801(1) and (15) pertains only to the amount of marijuana the patient can legally possess, not the type or form…”
State v. Jones, 424 P.3d 447 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(9) — 5 cases
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II, 373 P.3d 549 (Ariz. 2016). “CHIEF JUSTICE BALES, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 Here we consider whether the odor of marijuana suffices to establish probable cause for issuance of a search warrant, given the adoption of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (“AMMA”), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 2819. We hold that it…”
State of Arizona v. Rodney Christopher Jones, 440 P.3d 1139 (Ariz. 2019). “) Section 36-2801(8) provides the definition of marijuana, and nothing in § 36-2801(1) or (15) alters its meaning. Rather, by its own language, the limitation in § 36-2801(1) and (15) pertains only to the amount of marijuana the patient can legally possess, not the type or form…”
State v. Okun, 296 P.3d 998 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). “” See A.R.S. § 36-2801(1) (defining “allowable amount”).”
Arizona Cannabis Nurses Ass'n v. Arizona Dep't of Health Servs., 392 P.3d 506 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “) §§ 36-2801 through -2819 (2017). 2 DHS granted the petition, subject to certain conditions.”
State of Arizona v. Justin James Chase, 304 P.3d 1088 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). “¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner State of Arizona challenges the respondent judge’s ruling remanding the criminal action against Justin Chase to the grand jury and ordering that it be instructed on two possible “interpretations” of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA),…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(l)(a) — 2 cases
State of Arizona v. Justin James Chase, 304 P.3d 1088 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). “¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner State of Arizona challenges the respondent judge’s ruling remanding the criminal action against Justin Chase to the grand jury and ordering that it be instructed on two possible “interpretations” of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA),…”
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II, 359 P.3d 1 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015). “¶2 We address here the effect of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 36-2819, on determinations of probable cause.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(l)(a)(i) — 1 case
State v. Maestas, 394 P.3d 21 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(l)(a)(ii) — 1 case
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II, 359 P.3d 1 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015). “¶2 We address here the effect of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 36-2819, on determinations of probable cause.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2801(l)(b)(ii) — 1 case
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II, 359 P.3d 1 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015). “¶2 We address here the effect of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA), A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through 36-2819, on determinations of probable cause.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.