36-521. Preparation of petition for court-ordered evaluation; procedures for prepetition screening
A. On receiving the application for evaluation, the screening agency, before filing a petition for court-ordered evaluation, shall provide prepetition screening within forty-eight hours excluding weekends and holidays when possible to determine whether there is reasonable cause to believe the person has a persistent or acute disability or a grave disability or is a danger to self or others as a result of a mental disorder, and whether the person will voluntarily receive evaluation at a scheduled time and place.
B. After prepetition screening has been completed, the screening agency shall prepare a report of opinions and conclusions. If prepetition screening is not possible, the screening agency shall prepare a report giving reasons why the screening was not possible and including opinions and conclusions of staff members who attempted to conduct prepetition screening or otherwise investigated the matter.
C. If the prepetition screening agency determines that the application for evaluation is to be denied, the denial shall be stated in writing on the application form and shall be reviewed and confirmed by the medical director of the screening agency or the medical director's designee. If the screening agency determines that although the person does not currently meet the criteria for court-ordered evaluation, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the person has a mental disorder, is in need of further evaluation or treatment and is able and willing to pursue private or public evaluation or treatment services available to the person in the community, the screening agency shall assist the proposed patient in finding specific evaluation or treatment services in the proposed patient's area and, if requested, make a direct referral to a person, agency or organization providing behavioral health services for the purpose of evaluation and treatment.
D. If, based on the allegations of the applicant for the court-ordered evaluation and the prepetition screening report or other information obtained while attempting to conduct a prepetition screening, the agency determines that there is reasonable cause to believe that the proposed patient is, as a result of mental disorder, a danger to self or to others or has a persistent or acute disability or a grave disability and that the proposed patient is unable or unwilling to voluntarily receive evaluation or is likely to present a danger to self or to others, has a grave disability or will further deteriorate before receiving a voluntary evaluation, the agency shall prepare a petition for court-ordered evaluation and shall file the petition, which shall be signed by the person who prepared the petition unless the county attorney performs these functions. If the agency determines that there is reasonable cause to believe that the person is in such a condition that without immediate hospitalization he is likely to harm himself or others, the agency shall take all reasonable steps to procure such hospitalization on an emergency basis.
E. The agency may contact the county attorney in order to obtain assistance in preparing the petition for court-ordered evaluation, and the agency may request the advice and judgment of the county attorney in reaching a decision as to whether the court-ordered evaluation is justified.
F. The county attorney may prepare or sign or file the petition if a court has ordered the county attorney to prepare the petition.
G. If a petition for court-ordered evaluation alleges danger to others as described in section 36-501, the screening agency, before filing such a petition, shall contact the county attorney for a review of the petition. The county attorney shall examine the petition and make one of the following written recommendations:
1. That a criminal investigation is warranted.
2. That the screening agency shall file the petition.
3. That no further proceedings are warranted. The screening agency shall consider the recommendation in determining whether a court-ordered evaluation is justified and shall include the recommendation with the petition if the agency decides to file the petition with the court.
H. The petition shall be made in the form and manner prescribed by the director.
I. If a petition for court-ordered evaluation is filed by a prosecutor pursuant to section 13-4517, a prior application for court-ordered evaluation or prescreening is not necessary.
Notes of Decisions
In Re Mh 2008-002659, 226 P.3d 394 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 36-521(D) (2009). A PCOE must contain a “statement alleging that there is reasonable cause to believe that the proposed patient has a mental disorder and is as a result a danger to self or others, is persistently or acutely disabled or is gravely disabled and is…”
In re MH 2008-000028, 211 P.3d 1261 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 2× “§ 36-530; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED appointing the Deputy Public Defender assigned to mental health proceedings as co-counsel during all civil mental health proceedings; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the County Attorney is to file a Petition for Court-Ordered Evaluation with the Clerk…”
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx, 120 P.3d 210 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 2× “" ¶ 4 A Petition for Court-Ordered Evaluation was filed, A.R.S. §§ 36-521, -523, and a Detention Order for Evaluation and Notice was granted.”
In re MH 2004-001987, 120 P.3d 210 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 2× “” ¶ 4 A Petition for Court-Ordered Evaluation was filed, A.R.S. §§ 36-521, -523, and a Detention Order for Evaluation and Notice was granted.”
In re MH 2007-000937, 189 P.3d 1090 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 2× “¶3 On May 31, after the agency had screened the application, see A.R.S. § 36-521, Dr. Shakuntala Jain filed a petition for court-ordered evaluation of K.”
SOROKIN v. Arnold, 219 P.3d 250 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 24× “Section 36-523(C) requires the screening agency to attach various documents, including “the recommendation of the county attorney pursuant to § 36-521 ... unless such documents have not been prepared under a provision of law or in accordance with an order of the court.”
In re MH 2008-001795, 218 P.3d 1020 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 4× “A.R.S. § 36-521(D). The petition must contain certain elements, including the allegation that the proposed patient is, as a result of a mental disorder, a danger to self *565 or others, persistently or acutely disabled, or gravely disabled, and unwilling or unable to undergo…”
In Re: Mh2023-004502 (Ariz. 2026).
· cites it 4× “See A.R.S. § 36-521(A). If the screening establishes reasonable cause to believe that the person has a mental disability and will not voluntarily undergo an evaluation, the healthcare agency must prepare and file a petition for a court-ordered evaluation.”
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx, 211 P.3d 1261 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 2× “IT IS FURTHER ORDERED appointing the Deputy Public Defender assigned to mental health proceedings as co-counsel during all civil mental health proceedings; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the County Attorney is to file a Petition for Court-Ordered Evaluation with the Clerk of the…”
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx, 218 P.3d 1020 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 8× “A.R.S. § 36-521(A) (2009). If reasonable cause exists, the agency prepares and files a petition for court-ordered evaluation.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-521(A) — 3 cases
In Re: Mh2023-004502 (Ariz. 2026).
“See A.R.S. § 36-521(A). If the screening establishes reasonable cause to believe that the person has a mental disability and will not voluntarily undergo an evaluation, the healthcare agency must prepare and file a petition for a court-ordered evaluation.”
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx, 218 P.3d 1020 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
“A.R.S. § 36-521(A) (2009). If reasonable cause exists, the agency prepares and files a petition for court-ordered evaluation.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-521(D) — 5 cases
In Re Mh 2008-002659, 226 P.3d 394 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).
“A.R.S. § 36-521(D) (2009). A PCOE must contain a “statement alleging that there is reasonable cause to believe that the proposed patient has a mental disorder and is as a result a danger to self or others, is persistently or acutely disabled or is gravely disabled and is…”
In re MH 2008-001795, 218 P.3d 1020 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
“A.R.S. § 36-521(D). The petition must contain certain elements, including the allegation that the proposed patient is, as a result of a mental disorder, a danger to self *565 or others, persistently or acutely disabled, or gravely disabled, and unwilling or unable to undergo…”
In Re: Mh2023-004502 (Ariz. 2026).
“See A.R.S. § 36-521(A). If the screening establishes reasonable cause to believe that the person has a mental disability and will not voluntarily undergo an evaluation, the healthcare agency must prepare and file a petition for a court-ordered evaluation.”
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx, 218 P.3d 1020 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
“A.R.S. § 36-521(A) (2009). If reasonable cause exists, the agency prepares and files a petition for court-ordered evaluation.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-521(F) — 3 cases
In re MH 2008-000028, 211 P.3d 1261 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
“§ 36-530; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED appointing the Deputy Public Defender assigned to mental health proceedings as co-counsel during all civil mental health proceedings; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the County Attorney is to file a Petition for Court-Ordered Evaluation with the Clerk…”
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx, 211 P.3d 1261 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED appointing the Deputy Public Defender assigned to mental health proceedings as co-counsel during all civil mental health proceedings; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the County Attorney is to file a Petition for Court-Ordered Evaluation with the Clerk of the…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-521(G) — 1 case
SOROKIN v. Arnold, 219 P.3d 250 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
“Section 36-523(C) requires the screening agency to attach various documents, including “the recommendation of the county attorney pursuant to § 36-521 ... unless such documents have not been prepared under a provision of law or in accordance with an order of the court.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-521(G)(1) — 1 case
SOROKIN v. Arnold, 219 P.3d 250 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
“Section 36-523(C) requires the screening agency to attach various documents, including “the recommendation of the county attorney pursuant to § 36-521 ... unless such documents have not been prepared under a provision of law or in accordance with an order of the court.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-521(G)(2) — 1 case
SOROKIN v. Arnold, 219 P.3d 250 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
“Section 36-523(C) requires the screening agency to attach various documents, including “the recommendation of the county attorney pursuant to § 36-521 ... unless such documents have not been prepared under a provision of law or in accordance with an order of the court.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-521(H) — 2 cases
In re MH 2008-001795, 218 P.3d 1020 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
“A.R.S. § 36-521(D). The petition must contain certain elements, including the allegation that the proposed patient is, as a result of a mental disorder, a danger to self *565 or others, persistently or acutely disabled, or gravely disabled, and unwilling or unable to undergo…”
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx, 218 P.3d 1020 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
“A.R.S. § 36-521(A) (2009). If reasonable cause exists, the agency prepares and files a petition for court-ordered evaluation.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-521(I) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.