Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 40-360.26 (2026)

Damage of underground facility; liability to owner; homeowner and tenant exemption

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

40-360.26. Damage of underground facility; liability to owner; homeowner and tenant exemption

A. If any underground facility is damaged by any person in violation of this article as a result of failing to obtain information as to its location, failing to take measures for protection of the facilities or failing to excavate in a careful and prudent manner, the person is liable to the owner of the underground facility for the total cost of the repair of the facility.

B. A homeowner or homeowners' association engaging in excavating in an express or implied private property utility easement across property owned by the homeowner or homeowners’ association is not liable to the owner or operator of the underground facility damaged by the homeowner or homeowners' association pursuant to this section if the damaged underground facility is not buried or placed below ground in accordance with the applicable standards, if the underground facility is not located within the easement or if the homeowner or homeowners' association engaged in the excavation has complied with section 40-360.22.  This subsection does not apply to any person employed by a homeowner or a homeowners' association including a contractor licensed pursuant to title 32, chapter 10 or a person engaging in contracting without a license as prohibited by section 32-1151.

C. Notwithstanding any other provision in this article, a homeowner is not liable for any costs or expenses, including damage to third parties, resulting from damage to an underground facility owned by the homeowner but located within a public right-of-way if the damage was not caused by the homeowner's actions or by the homeowner's refusal to grant permission to the underground facilities operator of a sewer system to access the real property for the purpose of ascertaining the location of the underground sewer facility.  A tenant is not liable for any costs or expenses, including damage to third parties, resulting from damage to an underground facility owned by the tenant but located within a mobile home park if the damage was not caused by the tenant's actions or by the tenant's refusal to grant permission to the landlord to access the mobile home for the purpose of ascertaining the location of the underground facility.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1987–2019 · leading case: Sprint Commc'ns Co. v. W. Innovations, Inc., 618 F. Supp. 2d 1101 (D. Ariz. 2009).
Sprint Commc'ns Co. v. W. Innovations, Inc., 618 F. Supp. 2d 1101 (D. Ariz. 2009). · cites it 4× “If, therefore, Plaintiffs cause of action for negligence per se constitutes “liability created by statute” it is time barred. Conversely, however, actions “for injury done to the estate or the property of another” have a two year statute of limitations and are not time barred.”
Monares v. Wilcoxson, 736 P.2d 1171 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 40-360.26(B). JUROR SAFFORD We affirm the court’s refusal to strike Safford for cause because we find no clear showing of an abuse of discretion.”
Gunnell v. Arizona Pub. Serv. Co., 46 P.3d 399 (Ariz. 2002). “§ 40-360.26. Section 40-360.28(B), the key to the case, supplements this as follows: If a violation of this article results in physical contact with an underground facility, the violator is liable to the owner of the facility for all damages to the facilities and costs, expenses…”
Gunnell v. Arizona Pub. Serv. Co., 18 P.3d 176 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 10× “¶ 10 Section 40-360.26 (1996) addresses liability for damage to underground facilities as follows: A.”
Sprint Commc'ns Co. LP v. FNF Constr. Inc. (D. Ariz. 2019). · cites it 4× “16 A.R.S. § 40-360.26(A). Arizona law sets a one (1) year statute of limitations for all 17 actions “[u]pon a liability created by statute[.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 40-360.26(A) — 3 cases
Sprint Commc'ns Co. v. W. Innovations, Inc., 618 F. Supp. 2d 1101 (D. Ariz. 2009). “If, therefore, Plaintiffs cause of action for negligence per se constitutes “liability created by statute” it is time barred. Conversely, however, actions “for injury done to the estate or the property of another” have a two year statute of limitations and are not time barred.”
Gunnell v. Arizona Pub. Serv. Co., 18 P.3d 176 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001). “¶ 10 Section 40-360.26 (1996) addresses liability for damage to underground facilities as follows: A.”
Sprint Commc'ns Co. LP v. FNF Constr. Inc. (D. Ariz. 2019). “16 A.R.S. § 40-360.26(A). Arizona law sets a one (1) year statute of limitations for all 17 actions “[u]pon a liability created by statute[.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 40-360.26(B) — 1 case
Monares v. Wilcoxson, 736 P.2d 1171 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987). “See A.R.S. § 40-360.26(B). JUROR SAFFORD We affirm the court’s refusal to strike Safford for cause because we find no clear showing of an abuse of discretion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.