Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-2614 (2026)
Judicial review
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Except as provided in section 41-1092.08, subsection H, any final decision of the director under this chapter is subject to judicial review pursuant to title 12, chapter 7, article 6 by any party to the proceeding before the director, and the complaint seeking review shall be filed with the superior court in Maricopa county and served on the director and the purchasing agency.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1997–2016 · leading case: Grosvenor Holdings, L.C. v. Figueroa, 218 P.3d 1045 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
Grosvenor Holdings, L.C. v. Figueroa, 218 P.3d 1045 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). “2d at 557 ; see A.R.S. § 41-2614. ¶ 26 The County relies on that portion of R.”
R.L. Augustine Constr. Co. v. Peoria Unified Sch. Dist. No. 11, 936 P.2d 554 (Ariz. 1997). “In contrast, the Board of Education’s procurement rules have no provision for judicial review. The Governing Board argues that A.”
Falcone Bros. & Assocs., Inc. v. City of Tucson, 381 P.3d 276 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). “Section 41-2614 of our state code provides that a final administrative decision concerning procurement is subject to judicial review under the Administrative Review Act (ARA), AR.”
Grosvenor Holdings v. Pinal Cnty. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). “2d at 557 ; see A.R.S. § 41-2614. ¶26 The County relies on that portion of R.”
Falcone Bros. & Assocs., Inc. v. City of Tucson (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). “Section 41-2614 of our state code provides that a final administrative decision concerning procurement is subject to judicial review under the Administrative Review Act (ARA), A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.