Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 41
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-2615 (2026)

Exclusive remedy

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, including title 12, chapter 7, article 2 and title 12, chapter 21, this article and the rules adopted under this article shall provide the exclusive procedure for asserting a claim against this state or any agency of this state arising in relation to any procurement conducted under this chapter.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1991–2016 · leading case: Ry-Tan Constr., Inc. v. Washington Elementary Sch. Dist. No. 6, 93 P.3d 1095 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ry-Tan Constr., Inc. v. Washington Elementary Sch. Dist. No. 6, 93 P.3d 1095 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “” Further, A.R.S. § 41-2615 (1999), which is contained in title 41, chapter 23, and is thus a statute with which the Procurement Code is mandated to be consistent, explicitly states that the general claims statute is inapplicable: Notwithstanding any law to the contrary,…”
Howland v. State, 818 P.2d 1169 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 41-2615 (A.R.S. § 12-821 does not apply to any claims arising from contracts covered by the Procurement Code).”
Alii Sec. Sys., Inc. v. Prof'l Sec. Consultants, 383 P.3d 104 (Haw. App. 2016). “The Procurement Code as a whole, taking into account the legislative history and context, suggests that the Exclusive Remedy Provision is only intended to limit remedies that a bidder can bring against the governmental agency.”
Canon Sch. Dist. 50 v. Wes Const., 848 P.2d 848 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992). “Section 41-2615 of the state procurement code provides: Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, including the provisions of .”
Commc'ns-Pac., Inc. v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 221 P.3d 505 (Haw. App. 2009). “690 (2009), Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 41-2615 (2009), Mont.”
Canon Sch. Dist. No. 50 v. W.E.S. Constr. Co., 848 P.2d 848 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992). “Section 41-2615 of the state procurement code provides: Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, including the provisions of .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.