In this article, unless the context otherwise requires:
1. "Buyer" means any natural person who is solicited to purchase or who purchases the services of a credit services organization.
2. "Credit services organization" means a person who, with respect to the extension of credit by others, sells, provides, performs or represents that he can or will sell, provide or perform any of the following services in return for the payment of monies or other valuable consideration:
(a) Improving a buyer's credit record, history or rating.
(b) Obtaining an extension of credit for a buyer.
(c) Providing advice or assistance to a buyer with regard to either subdivision (a) or (b) of this paragraph.
3. "Extension of credit" means the right to defer payment of debt or to incur debt and defer its payment, which is offered or granted primarily for personal, family or household purposes.
Notes of Decisions
Lovick v. Ritemoney Ltd., 378 F.3d 433 (5th Cir. 2004).
“, Ariz.Rev. Stat. § 44-1701 et seq.; Arx.Code § 4-91-101 et seq.”
State v. Bradley, 433 P.2d 273 (Ariz. 1967).
“) Prior to the adoption of Rule 250, Rules of Criminal Procedure, section 44-1701 of the 1939 Code required a second judicial sanity hearing.”
State of Arizona v. MacIas, 131 P.2d 810 (Ariz. 1942).
“§ 44-1701, Arizona Code 1939. The matter was heard and a large amount of testimony was taken, after which the court *95 held that defendant’s mental condition was not such that he was unable to properly assist in the defense of the action.”
Porta House, Inc. v. Scottsdale Auto Lease, Inc., 584 P.2d 579 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1978).
“§§ 32-1171 through 32-1197 (formerly §§ 44-1701 through 44-1714), relating to mobile and manufactured housing standards, establishes licensing requirements for the manufacture of certain types of mobile homes, factory-built buildings, and recreational vehicles.”
State v. Stracuzzi, 289 P.2d 187 (Ariz. 1955).
· cites it 4× “filed a motion, under Section 44-1701, A.C.A.1939, seeking an order for a mental examination of the defendant to determine whether he was then insane, or mentally defective to the extent that he was then unable to understand the proceedings against him or to assist counsel in…”
State v. Reynolds, 497 P.2d 812 (Ariz. 1972).
· cites it 2× “1939, § 44-1701. This case is governed by our present Rule 250 and not § 44— 1701.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.