Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 46-140.01 (2026)

Verifying applicants for public benefits; violation; classification; citizen suits

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(Caution: 1998 Prop. 105 applies.)

A. An agency of this state and all of its political subdivisions, including local governments, that are responsible for the administration of state and local public benefits that are not federally mandated shall do all of the following:

1. Verify the identity of each applicant for those benefits and verify that the applicant is eligible for benefits as prescribed by this section.

2. Provide any other employee of this state or any of its political subdivisions with information to verify the immigration status of any applicant for those benefits and assist the employee in obtaining that information from federal immigration authorities.

3. Refuse to accept any identification card issued by the state or any political subdivision of this state, including a driver license, to establish identity or determine eligibility for those benefits unless the issuing authority has verified the immigration status of the applicant.

4. Require all employees of the state and its political subdivisions to make a written report to federal immigration authorities for any violation of federal immigration law by any applicant for benefits and that is discovered by the employee.

B. Failure to report discovered violations of federal immigration law by an employee is a class 2 misdemeanor. If that employee's supervisor knew of the failure to report and failed to direct the employee to make the report, the supervisor is guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor.

C. This section shall be enforced without regard to race, religion, gender, ethnicity or national origin. Any person who is a resident of this state shall have standing in any court of record to bring suit against any agent or agency of this state or its political subdivisions to remedy any violation of any provision of this section, including an action for mandamus. Courts shall give preference to actions brought under this section over other civil actions or proceeding pending in the court.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2024 · leading case: Yes on Prop 200 v. Napolitano, 160 P.3d 1216 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Yes on Prop 200 v. Napolitano, 160 P.3d 1216 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 12× “Section six of that proposition, now codified as A.R.S. § 46-140.01 (2005), requires agencies of the state and local governments that administer “state and local public benefits that are not federally mandated” to verify the immigration status of applicants for benefits and…”

Runyard v. Runyard (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 4× “Citing A.R.S. § 46-140.01, which requires state agencies to verify the identity and immigration status of each applicant for public benefits, Wife contends that because she ceased being an Arizona resident in August 2014, the court erred by allowing the GAL to participate in any…”

In Re the Marriage of quijada/dominguez, 550 P.3d 153 (Ariz. 2024). · cites it 2× “, A.R.S. § 46-140.01 (requiring “agenc[ies] of this state and all of its political subdivisions” to “verify the immigration status” of applicants for certain state and local public benefits).”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 46-140.01(0) — 1 case

Yes on Prop 200 v. Napolitano, 160 P.3d 1216 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). “Section six of that proposition, now codified as A.R.S. § 46-140.01 (2005), requires agencies of the state and local governments that administer “state and local public benefits that are not federally mandated” to verify the immigration status of applicants for benefits and…”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 46-140.01(C) — 1 case

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.