Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-2101 (2026)
Short title
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the uniform commercial code - - sales.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1985–2005 · leading case: Pac. Am. Leasing Corp. v. S.P.E. Bldg. Sys., Inc., 730 P.2d 273 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986).
Pac. Am. Leasing Corp. v. S.P.E. Bldg. Sys., Inc., 730 P.2d 273 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986). “It also argues that the specific sections of Article 2 dealing with warranty, unconscionability and revocation of acceptance are inapplicable or unavailable to Building Systems in this case. Since we have concluded that the trial court erroneously entered judgment in favor of…”
City of Phoenix v. Great W. Bank & Trust, 712 P.2d 966 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). “Unlike a sales contract under the Sales provisions (§ 47-2101 et seq.), we are not here concerned with the common understandings between the parties.”
Davis v. Par Wholesale Auto, Inc. (In Re Tucker), 329 B.R. 291 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 2005). “§ 47-1201(9) also explicitly requires possession in order to qualify as a buyer in the ordinary course: “[o]nly a buyer that takes possession of the goods or has the right to recover the goods from the seller under chapter 2 of this title [A.R.S. § 47-2101, et seq.] may be a…”
Hutcherson v. Sears Roebuck & Co. (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 47-2101 et seq . (West 1997).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.