Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-2105 (2026)

Definitions: transferability; "goods"; "future" goods; "lot"; "commercial unit"

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. "Goods" means all things (including specially manufactured goods) which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale other than the money in which the price is to be paid, investment securities (chapter 8 of this title) and things in action. "Goods" also includes the unborn young of animals and growing crops and other identified things attached to realty as described in the section on goods to be severed from realty (section 47-2107).

B. Goods must be both existing and identified before any interest in them can pass. Goods which are not both existing and identified are "future" goods. A purported present sale of future goods or of any interest therein operates as a contract to sell.

C. There may be a sale of a part interest in existing identified goods.

D. An undivided share in an identified bulk of fungible goods is sufficiently identified to be sold although the quantity of the bulk is not determined. Any agreed proportion of such a bulk or any quantity thereof agreed upon by number, weight or other measure may to the extent of the seller's interest in the bulk be sold to the buyer who then becomes an owner in common.

E. "Lot" means a parcel or a single article which is the subject matter of a separate sale or delivery, whether or not it is sufficient to perform the contract.

F. "Commercial unit" means such a unit of goods as by commercial usage is a single whole for purposes of sale and division of which materially impairs its character or value on the market or in use. A commercial unit may be a single article (as a machine) or a set of articles (as a suite of furniture or an assortment of sizes) or a quantity (as a bale, gross, or carload) or any other unit treated in use or in the relevant market as a single whole.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2004–2026 · leading case: Hillery v. Georgie Boy Mfg., Inc., 341 F. Supp. 2d 1112 (D. Ariz. 2004).
Hillery v. Georgie Boy Mfg., Inc., 341 F. Supp. 2d 1112 (D. Ariz. 2004). · cites it 2× “” A.R.S. § 47-2105(A). Thus, a a breach of warranty claim brought pursuant to the U.”
Haute Plank Inc. v. Grato S.L. LLC (D. Ariz. 2026). · cites it 4× “See A.R.S. § 47-2105. Therefore, it is governed by the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) as codified in the Arizona Revised Statutes.”
SiteLock LLC v. GoDaddy.com LLC (D. Ariz. 2022). · cites it 2× “” A.R.S. § 47-2105(A). “If a 3 transaction ‘includes both goods and services, most courts seek to determine whether the 4 predominant aspect and purpose of the contract is the sale of goods or the providing of 5 services.”
Brad Hall & Assocs. Inc. v. Elkotb (D. Ariz. 2023). · cites it 2× “2022 ) (typical distributorship agreements are most often classified as contracts for 2 the sale of goods… such as “a contract for the sale of goods where the distributor purchased 3 and received products from the manufacturer and then resold those products directly to the 4…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-2105(A) — 4 cases
Hillery v. Georgie Boy Mfg., Inc., 341 F. Supp. 2d 1112 (D. Ariz. 2004). “” A.R.S. § 47-2105(A). Thus, a a breach of warranty claim brought pursuant to the U.”
SiteLock LLC v. GoDaddy.com LLC (D. Ariz. 2022). “” A.R.S. § 47-2105(A). “If a 3 transaction ‘includes both goods and services, most courts seek to determine whether the 4 predominant aspect and purpose of the contract is the sale of goods or the providing of 5 services.”
Brad Hall & Assocs. Inc. v. Elkotb (D. Ariz. 2023). “2022 ) (typical distributorship agreements are most often classified as contracts for 2 the sale of goods… such as “a contract for the sale of goods where the distributor purchased 3 and received products from the manufacturer and then resold those products directly to the 4…”
Haute Plank Inc. v. Grato S.L. LLC (D. Ariz. 2026). “See A.R.S. § 47-2105. Therefore, it is governed by the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) as codified in the Arizona Revised Statutes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.