Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9334 (2026)

Priority of security interests in fixtures and crops

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. A security interest under this chapter may be created in goods that are fixtures or may continue in goods that become fixtures. A security interest does not exist under this chapter in ordinary building materials incorporated into an improvement on land.

B. This chapter does not prevent creation of an encumbrance on fixtures under real property law.

C. In cases not governed by subsections D through H of this section, a security interest in fixtures is subordinate to a conflicting interest of an encumbrancer or owner of the related real property other than the debtor.

D. Except as otherwise provided in subsection H of this section, a perfected security interest in fixtures has priority over a conflicting interest of an encumbrancer or owner of the real property if the debtor has an interest of record in or is in possession of the real property and:

1. The security interest is a purchase money security interest;

2. The interest of the encumbrancer or owner arises before the goods become fixtures; and

3. The security interest is perfected by a fixture filing before the goods become fixtures or within twenty days thereafter.

E. A perfected security interest in fixtures has priority over a conflicting interest of an encumbrancer or owner of the real property if:

1. The debtor has an interest of record in the real property or is in possession of the real property and the security interest:

(a) Is perfected by a fixture filing before the interest of the encumbrancer or owner is of record; and

(b) Has priority over any conflicting interest of a predecessor in title of the encumbrancer or owner;

2. Before the goods become fixtures, the security interest is perfected by any method permitted by this chapter and the fixtures are readily removable:

(a) Factory or office machines;

(b) Equipment that is not primarily used or leased for use in the operation of the real property; or

(c) Replacements of domestic appliances that are consumer goods;

3. The conflicting interest is a lien on the real property obtained by legal or equitable proceedings after the security interest was perfected by any method permitted by this chapter; or

4. The security interest is:

(a) Created in a manufactured home in a manufactured home transaction; and

(b) Perfected pursuant to a statute described in section 47-9311, subsection A, paragraph 2.

F. A security interest in fixtures, whether or not perfected, has priority over a conflicting interest of an encumbrancer or owner of the real property if:

1. The encumbrancer or owner has consented, in an authenticated record, to the security interest or disclaimed an interest in the goods as fixtures; or

2. The debtor has a right to remove the goods as against the encumbrancer or owner.

G. The priority of the security interest under subsection F, paragraph 2 of this section continues for a reasonable time if the debtor's right to remove the goods as against the encumbrancer or owner terminates.

H. A mortgage is a construction mortgage to the extent that it secures an obligation incurred for the construction of an improvement on land, including the acquisition cost of the land, if a recorded record of the mortgage so indicates. Except as otherwise provided in subsections E and F of this section, a security interest in fixtures is subordinate to a construction mortgage if a record of the mortgage is recorded before the goods become fixtures and the goods become fixtures before the completion of the construction. A mortgage has this priority to the same extent as a construction mortgage to the extent that it is given to refinance a construction mortgage.

I. A perfected security interest in crops growing on real property has priority over a conflicting interest of an encumbrancer or owner of the real property if the debtor has an interest of record in or is in possession of the real property.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2003–2012 · leading case: FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C., 281 P.3d 1028 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C., 281 P.3d 1028 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 6× “A.R.S. § 47-9334(F). The Trust argues, and we agree, that because this court found that the Trust’s priority arises under both subsections (F)(1) and (F)(2), the “reasonable time” limitation does not apply because it does not apply to subsection (F)(1).”
Bilke v. State, 80 P.3d 269 (Ariz. 2003). · cites it 2× “05(B) (1999) (granting receiver title to assets of a bank in receivership "upon which a creditor of the bank could have obtained a lien by legal or equitable proceedings”) (emphasis added); A.R.S. § 47-9334(E)(3) (Supp.2003) (granting priority to a perfected security interest in…”
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C., 111 P.3d 430 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 29× “See A.R.S. § 47-9334. The amendment addressed the conflict between the two systems by generally requiring real property recordation for “fixture filings.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9334(A) — 1 case
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C., 111 P.3d 430 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). “See A.R.S. § 47-9334. The amendment addressed the conflict between the two systems by generally requiring real property recordation for “fixture filings.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9334(B) — 1 case
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C., 111 P.3d 430 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). “See A.R.S. § 47-9334. The amendment addressed the conflict between the two systems by generally requiring real property recordation for “fixture filings.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9334(C) — 1 case
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C., 111 P.3d 430 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). “See A.R.S. § 47-9334. The amendment addressed the conflict between the two systems by generally requiring real property recordation for “fixture filings.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9334(D) — 1 case
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C., 111 P.3d 430 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). “See A.R.S. § 47-9334. The amendment addressed the conflict between the two systems by generally requiring real property recordation for “fixture filings.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9334(E)(3) — 1 case
Bilke v. State, 80 P.3d 269 (Ariz. 2003). “05(B) (1999) (granting receiver title to assets of a bank in receivership "upon which a creditor of the bank could have obtained a lien by legal or equitable proceedings”) (emphasis added); A.R.S. § 47-9334(E)(3) (Supp.2003) (granting priority to a perfected security interest in…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9334(F) — 2 cases
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C., 281 P.3d 1028 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012). “A.R.S. § 47-9334(F). The Trust argues, and we agree, that because this court found that the Trust’s priority arises under both subsections (F)(1) and (F)(2), the “reasonable time” limitation does not apply because it does not apply to subsection (F)(1).”
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C., 111 P.3d 430 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). “See A.R.S. § 47-9334. The amendment addressed the conflict between the two systems by generally requiring real property recordation for “fixture filings.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9334(F)(2) — 1 case
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C., 111 P.3d 430 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). “See A.R.S. § 47-9334. The amendment addressed the conflict between the two systems by generally requiring real property recordation for “fixture filings.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9334(G) — 2 cases
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C., 281 P.3d 1028 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012). “A.R.S. § 47-9334(F). The Trust argues, and we agree, that because this court found that the Trust’s priority arises under both subsections (F)(1) and (F)(2), the “reasonable time” limitation does not apply because it does not apply to subsection (F)(1).”
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C., 111 P.3d 430 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). “See A.R.S. § 47-9334. The amendment addressed the conflict between the two systems by generally requiring real property recordation for “fixture filings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.