Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 48-1751 (2026)

Restrictions on extension of power outside district; contracts with public bodies

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Power for pumping for irrigation service shall not be extended outside the district unless there is a surplus of power over and above the needs for irrigation in the district, but districts may make reasonable contracts with the state, cities and towns, municipal and other corporations or persons for cooperation in carrying out the construction and other plans for the organization of the district as provided by this chapter.

B. Districts may make such contracts as are reasonable taking into account the common needs of the district and users within the district.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2001–2001 · leading case: Hohokam Irrigation & Drainage Dist. v. Arizona Pub. Serv. Co., 35 P.3d 117 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hohokam Irrigation & Drainage Dist. v. Arizona Pub. Serv. Co., 35 P.3d 117 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “” And A.R.S. § 48-1751(A), which governs electrical districts, states that “[p]ower for pumping for irrigation service shall not be extended outside the district unless there is a surplus of power over and above the needs for irrigation in the district.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 48-1751(A) — 1 case

Hohokam Irrigation & Drainage Dist. v. Arizona Pub. Serv. Co., 35 P.3d 117 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001). “” And A.R.S. § 48-1751(A), which governs electrical districts, states that “[p]ower for pumping for irrigation service shall not be extended outside the district unless there is a surplus of power over and above the needs for irrigation in the district.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.