A. A juvenile probation officer shall prepare a disposition summary report for every juvenile who has been adjudicated of a delinquent act or of a technical violation of probation.
B. The juvenile probation officer shall evaluate the needs of the juvenile and the juvenile's risk to the community, including the nature of the offense, the delinquent history of the juvenile, the juvenile's history of referrals and adjustments and the recommendation of the juvenile's parents. The juvenile probation officer shall include the recommendation of the juvenile's parents in the disposition summary report. If the nature of the offense and the prior delinquent history of the juvenile indicate that the juvenile should be included in an intensive probation program pursuant to supreme court guidelines for juvenile intensive probation, the juvenile probation officer may recommend to the court that the juvenile be granted intensive probation.
C. After reviewing the juvenile's prior record, the facts and circumstances of the current delinquent act or technical violation of probation and the disposition summary report, the court may grant the juvenile a period of intensive probation.
D. When granting intensive probation the court shall set forth on the record the factual reasons for using the disposition.
E. Intensive probation shall be conditioned on the juvenile:
1. Participating in one or more of the following, if approved by the court or probation officer, throughout the term of probation:
(a) School.
(b) A treatment program.
(c) Employment.
(d) Supervised community restitution work.
(e) An activity that improves the juvenile's prosocial skill development, including enhancing the juvenile's relationship with the juvenile's family.
2. Paying victim restitution, applicable monetary obligations and probation fees, except that the inability to pay probation fees, applicable monetary obligations or victim restitution does not prohibit participation in the intensive probation program.
3. Remaining at a place of residence at all times except to attend school, work or treatment, to perform community restitution or to participate in prosocial activity, as specifically allowed by the supervising juvenile probation officer, or if in the direct company of a parent, guardian or custodian, as approved by the juvenile probation officer.
4. Allowing administration of drug and alcohol tests as directed by a juvenile probation officer.
5. Meeting any other conditions imposed by the court, including electronic monitoring, to meet the needs of the juvenile or to limit the risks to the community.
F. Probation fees shall be deposited in the juvenile probation fund established pursuant to section 12-268.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
8
cases, 1999–2019 · leading case:
In Re Sheree M., 4 P.3d 1067 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).
In Re Sheree M., 4 P.3d 1067 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).
· cites it 14× “Further, the legislature has amended A.R.S. § 8-352 in the ten years since Administrative Order 90-9 took effect without undertaking any revision that would reject the interpretation embodied in that order.”
In Re R.E., 387 P.3d 1288 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 6× “Section 8-352, A.R.S., identifies the evaluation and criteria required for a juvenile’s placement on JIPS.”
In re J.G., 993 P.2d 1055 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 6× “argues that the juvenile court abused its discretion by violating the Arizona Supreme Court guidelines for imposing JIPS and by failing to make a record of its factual reasons for imposing JIPS.”
In Re Shane B., 979 P.2d 1014 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
“§ 8-272(C)(renumbered as § 8-352(C)); the court imposed no punishment under A.”
In Re Jg, 993 P.2d 1055 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 6× “argues that the juvenile court abused its discretion by violating the Arizona Supreme Court guidelines for imposing JIPS and by failing to make a record of its factual reasons for imposing JIPS.”
In Re Humberto S. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 6× “" A.R.S. § 8-352(C) (2018). Consistent with our supreme court's guidelines for when the superior court may impose JIPS, Humberto had been adjudicated for a violation of probation imposed as a result of a delinquent act.”
In re J.A., 395 P.3d 314 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 5× “Similarly, A.R.S. § 8-352, which relates to JIPS, provides that the court may place a juvenile on JIPS if he or she meets the various conditions listed in the statute as well as any other “conditions imposed by the court, including electronic monitoring.”
In Re Castillo C. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 4× “§ 6-302(H)(7); A.R.S. § 8-352(B), (C); In re J.G., 196 Ariz.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-352(A) — 1 case
In Re Sheree M., 4 P.3d 1067 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).
“Further, the legislature has amended A.R.S. § 8-352 in the ten years since Administrative Order 90-9 took effect without undertaking any revision that would reject the interpretation embodied in that order.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-352(B) — 5 cases
In Re R.E., 387 P.3d 1288 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
“Section 8-352, A.R.S., identifies the evaluation and criteria required for a juvenile’s placement on JIPS.”
In Re Sheree M., 4 P.3d 1067 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).
“Further, the legislature has amended A.R.S. § 8-352 in the ten years since Administrative Order 90-9 took effect without undertaking any revision that would reject the interpretation embodied in that order.”
In re J.G., 993 P.2d 1055 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
“argues that the juvenile court abused its discretion by violating the Arizona Supreme Court guidelines for imposing JIPS and by failing to make a record of its factual reasons for imposing JIPS.”
In Re Jg, 993 P.2d 1055 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
“argues that the juvenile court abused its discretion by violating the Arizona Supreme Court guidelines for imposing JIPS and by failing to make a record of its factual reasons for imposing JIPS.”
In Re Castillo C. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
“§ 6-302(H)(7); A.R.S. § 8-352(B), (C); In re J.G., 196 Ariz.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-352(C) — 5 cases
In Re R.E., 387 P.3d 1288 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
“Section 8-352, A.R.S., identifies the evaluation and criteria required for a juvenile’s placement on JIPS.”
In Re Shane B., 979 P.2d 1014 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
“§ 8-272(C)(renumbered as § 8-352(C)); the court imposed no punishment under A.”
In re J.G., 993 P.2d 1055 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
“argues that the juvenile court abused its discretion by violating the Arizona Supreme Court guidelines for imposing JIPS and by failing to make a record of its factual reasons for imposing JIPS.”
In Re Humberto S. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
“" A.R.S. § 8-352(C) (2018). Consistent with our supreme court's guidelines for when the superior court may impose JIPS, Humberto had been adjudicated for a violation of probation imposed as a result of a delinquent act.”
In Re Jg, 993 P.2d 1055 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
“argues that the juvenile court abused its discretion by violating the Arizona Supreme Court guidelines for imposing JIPS and by failing to make a record of its factual reasons for imposing JIPS.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-352(D) — 5 cases
In Re R.E., 387 P.3d 1288 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
“Section 8-352, A.R.S., identifies the evaluation and criteria required for a juvenile’s placement on JIPS.”
In re J.G., 993 P.2d 1055 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
“argues that the juvenile court abused its discretion by violating the Arizona Supreme Court guidelines for imposing JIPS and by failing to make a record of its factual reasons for imposing JIPS.”
In Re Jg, 993 P.2d 1055 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
“argues that the juvenile court abused its discretion by violating the Arizona Supreme Court guidelines for imposing JIPS and by failing to make a record of its factual reasons for imposing JIPS.”
In Re Humberto S. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
“" A.R.S. § 8-352(C) (2018). Consistent with our supreme court's guidelines for when the superior court may impose JIPS, Humberto had been adjudicated for a violation of probation imposed as a result of a delinquent act.”
In Re Castillo C. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
“§ 6-302(H)(7); A.R.S. § 8-352(B), (C); In re J.G., 196 Ariz.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-352(E)(3) — 1 case
In Re Sheree M., 4 P.3d 1067 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).
“Further, the legislature has amended A.R.S. § 8-352 in the ten years since Administrative Order 90-9 took effect without undertaking any revision that would reject the interpretation embodied in that order.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-352(E)(5) — 1 case
In re J.A., 395 P.3d 314 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
“Similarly, A.R.S. § 8-352, which relates to JIPS, provides that the court may place a juvenile on JIPS if he or she meets the various conditions listed in the statute as well as any other “conditions imposed by the court, including electronic monitoring.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-352(E)(6) — 1 case
In re J.A., 395 P.3d 314 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
“Similarly, A.R.S. § 8-352, which relates to JIPS, provides that the court may place a juvenile on JIPS if he or she meets the various conditions listed in the statute as well as any other “conditions imposed by the court, including electronic monitoring.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.