Amendments.
The 2009 amendment rewrote the section.
Case Notes
Construction.
Supreme Court of Arkansas finds that this section is clear and unambiguous.
Simpson v. Cavalry SPV I, LLC, 2014 Ark. 363, 440 S.W.3d 335 (2014).
License Required.
On a certified question posed by a federal district court, the Supreme Court of Arkansas held that an entity that purchased delinquent accounts and filed lawsuits on its behalf in Arkansas was attempting to collect and, thus, was required to be licensed by the Arkansas State Board of Collection Agencies pursuant to subdivision (4) of this section.
Simpson v. Cavalry SPV I, LLC, 2014 Ark. 363, 440 S.W.3d 335 (2014).
Simpson v. Cavalry SPV I, LLC, 2014 Ark. 363 (Ark. 2014). · cites it 15ד§ 17-24-101 and must be licensed pursuant to Ark.Code Ann. § 17-24-301 because it . purchases and attempts to collect delinquent accounts.”
Cach, LLC v. Echols, 2016 Ark. 446 (Ark. 2016). · cites it 2דt held that an entity that purchases delinquent accounts and then retains a licensed Arkansas lawyer to collect on the delinquent accounts and file lawsuits on its behalf in Arkansas is a “collection agency” pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 17-24-101 and is required…”
Simpson v. Calvary SPV I, LLC, 2014 Ark. 33 (Ark. 2014). · cites it 2דWhether an entity that purchases delinquent accounts and then retains a licensed Arkansas lawyer to collect on the delinquent accounts and file lawsuits on its behalf in Arkansas is “attempting] to collect” and, thus, is required to be licensed by the Arkansas State Board of…”
Alexander v. Absolute Resolutions Corp. (W.D. Ark. 2019). · cites it 4דAlexander filed a motion for summary judgment in the Baxter County lawsuit, arguing that ARC had no authority to file that lawsuit because it had not obtained a license from the State Board of Collection Agencies (“SBCA”) to act as a collection agency in the state of Arkansas,…”
— Ark. Code Ann. § 17-24-301(4) — 3 cases
Simpson v. Cavalry SPV I, LLC, 2014 Ark. 363 (Ark. 2014). “§ 17-24-101 and must be licensed pursuant to Ark.Code Ann. § 17-24-301 because it . purchases and attempts to collect delinquent accounts.”
Cach, LLC v. Echols, 2016 Ark. 446 (Ark. 2016). “t held that an entity that purchases delinquent accounts and then retains a licensed Arkansas lawyer to collect on the delinquent accounts and file lawsuits on its behalf in Arkansas is a “collection agency” pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 17-24-101 and is required…”
Simpson v. Calvary SPV I, LLC, 2014 Ark. 33 (Ark. 2014). “Whether an entity that purchases delinquent accounts and then retains a licensed Arkansas lawyer to collect on the delinquent accounts and file lawsuits on its behalf in Arkansas is “attempting] to collect” and, thus, is required to be licensed by the Arkansas State Board of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.