Commonwealth v. Minker, 152 A.2d 449 (Pa. 1959). · Go Syfert
Search
Commonwealth v. Minker, 152 A.2d 449 (Pa. 1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Alajaji, J. v. Dubois Radiologists (pasuperct, 2016-03-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Alajaji, J. v. Dubois Radiologists
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · confidence medium
Rivoli, 152 A.2d at 451.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Johnson v. Glenn Sand and Gravel (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1982 · confidence medium
The limited exception to this rule that when a party's own "admissions le[ave] no issue for the jury to resolve, . . . [but] rather have the effect of an unintentional but still unconditional surrender," Rivoli Theatre Co. v. Allison, 396 Pa. 343, 346 , 152 A.2d 449, 451 (1959), does not apply here.
discussed Cited "see" Garcia v. Savage (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rivoli Theatre Co. v. Allison, 396 Pa. 343 , 152 A.2d 449 (1959).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Gleneagles Investment Co.
M.D. Penn. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rivoli Theatre Co., Inc. v. Allison, 396 Pa. 343 , 152 A.2d 449 (1959); Howell v. McCloskey, 375 Pa. 100 , 99 A.2d 610 (1953); Bailey v. Jacobs, 325 Pa. 187, 194 , 189 A. 320 (1937).
cited Cited "see" Insurance Co. of North America v. Stein
pactcomplphilad · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rivoli Theatre Co. v. Allison, 396 Pa. 343 , 152 A. 2d 449 (1959).
cited Cited "see" Whigham v. Pyle
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rivoli Theatre Co. v. Allison, 396 Pa. 343 , 152 A. 2d 449 (1959).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Local No. 163, International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal, Soft Drink & Distillery Workers v. Watkins
Pa. · 1965 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Rivoli Theater Company v. Allison, 396 Pa. 343 , 152 A. 2d 449 (1959).
Commonwealth
v.
Minker
Appeal, No. 350.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 28, 1959.
152 A.2d 449
Jacob Kossman, with him Samuel R. Liever, for appellant., Victor Wright, Deputy Attorney General, with him Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General, for appellee.
Bell, Cohen, Consideration, Jones, Musmanno, Took.
Published

Lead Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

This appeal raises the same questions as were raised in Commonwealth v. Fudeman, and for the reasons set forth in that opinion, which is reported in 396 Pa. 236, 152 A. 2d 428, the Order of the Superior Court quashing the appeal is affirmed.

Mr. Justice McBride took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno:

This appeal raises the same questions discussed in Commonwealth v. Fudeman, and, for the reasons set forth in my Dissenting Opinion in that case, I would reverse the order of the Superior Court quashing the appeal in this case.