Henry v. Control Prods. Co., 436 A.2d 982 (Pa. 1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Henry v. Control Prods. Co., 436 A.2d 982 (Pa. 1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Wideman, R. (pasuperct, 2023-12-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Wideman, R.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Wideman, [ 436 A.2d 982 (Pa. 1981)].
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frank HENRY
v.
CONTROL PRODUCTS COMPANY v. CERRO CORPORATION and Cerro Wire and Cable Company
Appeal No. 81-1-28.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct 8, 1981.
436 A.2d 982
Mark B. Aronson, Behrend, Aronson & Morrow, Pittsburgh, for appellant., Paul D. Kruper, George M. Evan, Pittsburgh, for Control Products., Daniel B. Winters, Charles Kirshner, Pittsburgh, for Cerro Corp. and Cerro Wire and Cable Co.
Brien, Flaherty, Kauffman, Larsen, Nix, Roberts, Wilkinson.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

[*230] OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

The appeal, 426 A.2d 116, is dismissed as having been improvidently granted.