green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. TARASCO
(2×)
See State v. Coleman, 14 Conn. App. 657, 675 , 544 A.2d 194 (“[j]ust as the defendant’s constitutional right to silence may not be unduly burdened . . . his constitutional right to testify, which is a corollary of his right to silence, must also be regarded as being free from undue cost” [citation omitted]), cert. denied, 208 Conn. 815 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. McCarthy
Facts cannot be established by not believing witnesses who deny them.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Carter, 196 Conn. 36, 50 , 490 A.2d 1000 (1985) (Shea, J., dissenting); see State v. Coleman, 14 Conn. App. 657, 671 , 544 A.2d 194 (while jury may reject witness’ testimony, it may not conclude from that rejection that opposite is true), cert. denied, 208 Conn. 815 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hinds
See State v. Coleman, 14 Conn. App. 657, 678 , 544 A.2d 194 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 815 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Faust
“We have equated this constitutionally required formulation of the harmless error standard; see State v. Coleman, 14 Conn. App. 657, 678-81 , 544 A.2d 194 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 815 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988); with our formulation that an instructional constitutional error is harmless if there is no reasonable possibility that the jury was misled.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ash
“We have equated this constitutionally required formulation of the harmless error standard; see State v. Coleman, 14 Conn. App. 657, 678-81 , 544 A.2d 194 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 815 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988); with our formulation that an instructional constitutional error is harmless if there is no reasonable possibility that the jury was misled.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cerilli
We have equated this constitutionally required formulation of the harmless error standard; see State v. Coleman, 14 Conn. App. 657, 678-81 , 544 A.2d 194 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 815 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988); with our formulation that an instructional constitutional error is harmless if there is no reasonable possibility that the jury was misled.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Spears
Where both the presumption of innocence and the reasonable doubt standard are linked with the challenged instruction, the use of clear instructions on these “logically similar” concepts; see State v. Coleman, 14 Conn. App. 657, 669 , 544 A.2d 194 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 815 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988); eliminates any risk that the jury will believe it is free to disregard those concepts in reaching its verdict.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Covenant Home, Inc.
v.
Board of Tax Review of the Town of Cromwell
v.
Board of Tax Review of the Town of Cromwell
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 26, 1988.
Edward T. Lynch, in support of the petition., Richard W. Tome, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 14 Conn. App. 441, is denied.