green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.9 score
“it cannot be determined from the record whether the plaintiff had fully performed his obligation under the contract or whether this was an executory contract.”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Shuster v. Shuster, No. Cv98 0062255s (May 23, 2000)
it cannot be determined from the record whether the plaintiff had fully performed his obligation under the contract or whether this was an executory contract.
discussed
Cited "see"
Squillante v. Capital Region Development Authority
(2×)
See Mac’s Car City, Inc. v. DeNigris, 18 Conn. App. 525, 529 , 559 A.2d 712 (error for court to grant summary judgment based on § 52-577 where statute not raised in pleadings), cert. denied, 212 Conn. 807 , 563 A.2d 1356 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Palmer v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.
See McClendon v. Soos, 18 Conn. App. 614, 616-17 , 559 A.2d 1163 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 808 , 563 A.2d 1356 (1989); Common Condominium, Assns., Inc. v. Common Associates, supra, 291-92.
discussed
Cited "see"
Caffery v. Stillman
(2×)
See Mac’s Car City, Inc. v. DeNigris, 18 Conn. App. 525, 529-30 , 559 A.2d 712 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 807 , 563 A.2d 1356 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Celentano v. Grudberg
(2×)
See Mac’s Car City, Inc. v. DeNigris, 18 Conn. App. 525, 530 , 559 A.2d 712 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 807 , 563 A.2d 1356 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nosik v. Mastronardi, No. Cv00 37 90 88 S (Mar. 11, 2002)
(2×)
See Mac's Car City, Inc. v. DeNigris, 18 Conn. App. 525 , 529 , 559 A.2d 712 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 807 , 563 A.2d 1356 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dolnack v. Metro-North Commuter, No. 30 46 20 (Nov. 3, 1995)
(2×)
See Mac's Car City, Inc. v. DeNigris, 18 Conn. App. 525 , 528-29 , 559 A.2d 712 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 807 , 563 A.2d 1356 (1989) (holding that it is inappropriate to grant summary judgment on Statute of Limitations grounds where the issue was not raised as a special defense); O'Conner v. Cutler Glass Co., Superior Court, Judicial District of Danbury, Docket No. 314181 (November 30, 1994, Leheny, J.) (holding that where Workers' Compensation exclusivity was not raised as a special defense, summary judgment could not be granted on those grounds).
cited
Cited "see"
Petrol Plus v. Fred D'onofrio, Inc., No. Cv93 035 17 00s (Sep. 20, 1995)
See Mac's Car City v. DeNigris, 18 Conn. App. 525 , 559 A.2d 712 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 807 , ___ A.2d ___ (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Greenwood v. Eastman-Kodak Company, No. Cv-92 0452919s (Mar. 25, 1994)
See Mac's Car City v. DeNigris, 18 Conn. App. 525 , 528 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 807 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Conrad v. Erickson, No. 69587 (Feb. 16, 1994)
(2×)
See Mac's Car City, Inc. v. DeNigris, 18 Conn. App. 525 , 528 , 559 A.2d 712 (1989), cert. denied, 212 Conn. 807 , 563 A.2d 1356 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matthews Group, Inc. v. Essex Savings Bank, No. 66719 (Mar. 15, 1993)
(2×)
In the present case, the defendant argues that the statute of limitations, under General Statutes Sec. 47-33a (a), and the doctrine of res adjudicata bars the plaintiff's present action seeking specific performance on the option agreement for the repurchase of real property. 3 Practice Book Sec. 164 provides in relevant part that "the statute of limitations and res judicata must be CT Page 2630 specially pleaded [as special defenses]." Practice Book Sec. 164; see Mac's Car City, Inc. v. DeNigris, 18 Conn. App. 525 , 528 , 559 A.2d 712 (1989), cert. denied, 212 Conn. 807 , 563 A.2d 1356 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Domek v. Pitegoff, No. 292504 (Jan. 17, 1991)
See Mac's Car City, Inc. v. DeNigris, 18 Conn. App. 525 , 528 (1989), cert. denied, 212 Conn. 807 (1989); Conn. Practice Bk. 164 (rev'd to 1978, as updated to July, 1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Connecticut Education Ass'n v. Milliman USA, Inc.
(2×)
In a claim such as this, the client [usually] has the option to sue for either breach *458 of an implied contract, negligence or both.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Celentano v. Grudberg, 76 Conn. App. 119, 124-25 , 818 A.2d 841 , cert. denied, 264 Conn. 904 , 823 A.2d 1220 (2003); see also Mac’s Car City, Inc. v. DeNigris, 18 Conn. App. 525, 530 , 559 A.2d 712 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 807 , 563 A.2d 1356 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
O'Connor v. Cutler Glass Co., No. 31 41 81 (Nov. 30, 1994)
(2×)
See, e.g., Mac's Car City, Inc. v. DeNigris, 18 Conn. App. 525 , 528-29 , 559 A.2d 712 (1989), cert. denied, 212 Conn. 807 , 563 A.2d 1356 (1989) (where the defendant failed to plead the Statute of Limitations as a special defense, the court held it was inappropriate to grant summary judgment on that basis).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Dexter P.
See Chesson v. Zoning commission, 157 Conn. 520, 527 , 254 A.2d 864 (1969); Donohue v. Zoning Board of Appeals, [ 155 Conn. 550, 554 , 235 A.2d 643 (1967)]; Winslow v. Zoning Board, [ 143 Conn. 381, 384 , 122 A.2d 789 (1956)]; Arrien v. Litchfield, 17 Conn. App. 320, 324 , 552 A.2d 445 (1989); see also Fidelity Trust Co. v. BVD Associates, [supra, 196 Conn. 278 ].” Ruotolo v. Inland Wetlands Agency, 18 Conn. App. 440, 448 , 558 A.2d 1021 , cert, denied, 212 Conn. 806 , 563 A.2d 1356 (1989); see Ghent v. Planning Commission, 219 Conn. 511 , 516 n.4, 594 A.2d 5 (1991); Yanni v. Del Ponte, 31 C…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Coric, No. 701894 (Jul. 22, 1992)
Ross Realty Corporation v. Surkis, 163 Conn. 388 , 391 , 311 A.2d 74 (1972); see also Mac's Car City v. DiNigro, 18 Conn. App. 525 , 528 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 807 (1989) (statute of limitations must be specially pleaded).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael Ruotolo
v.
Inland Wetlands Agency of the Town of Madison
v.
Inland Wetlands Agency of the Town of Madison
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 13, 1989.
Kenneth G. Bartlett, in support of the petition., Gail S. Kotowski, in opposition.
Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (1)
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 18 Conn. App. 440, is denied.