State v. Morrissey, 565 A.2d 541 (Conn. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Morrissey, 565 A.2d 541 (Conn. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Peterson, No. Mv 00 0312836 (Jan. 18, 2002) (connsuperct, 2002-01-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Peterson, No. Mv 00 0312836 (Jan. 18, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lamme , 19 Conn. App. 594 , 600 , 563 A.2d 1372 , cert. granted in part, 212 Conn. 820 , 565 A.2d 541 (1989), and aff'd, 216 Conn. 172 , 579 A.2d 484 (1990) ("[R]oadside sobriety tests that do not involve long delay or unreasonable intrusion, although searches under the fourth amendment , may be justified by an officer's reasonable suspicion (based on specific, articulable facts) that the driver is intoxicated.") (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Officer Lentini asked the defendant for his consent to administer field sobriety tests and the defendant gave his consent.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Johnson (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Conn. App. Ct. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Morrissey, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 541 (Supreme Court certified for review the question, “Did the Appellate Court err in remanding this case for a factual determination concerning the reasonableness of the police officer’s search in reliance upon their decision in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , holding that there is a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut Constitution”); State v. Marsala, 19 Conn. App. 478 , 563 A.2d 730 , cert. granted, 213 Conn. 805 , 567 A.2d 836 (1989) (Supreme Court certified for review the que…
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Ball, No. Cr 18 74479 (Aug. 27, 1992)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Hawkins, 19 Conn. App. 609 , 615 , 563 A.2d 745 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 820 , 565 A.2d 541 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
James Morrissey
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 12, 1989.
565 A.2d 541
Steven D. Ecker, in support of the petition., Geoffrey E. Marion, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 18 Conn. App. 658, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court err in remanding this case for a factual determination concerning the reasonableness of the police officer’s search in reliance upon its decision in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605, holding that there is a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut constitution?”