State v. Horne, 568 A.2d 793 (Conn. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Horne, 568 A.2d 793 (Conn. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
42 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Phillips (connappct, 2007-07-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Phillips (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lo Sacco v. Young, 20 Conn. App. 6, 14-15 , 564 A.2d 610 (affirming trial court’s ruling allowing state to impeach defendant with prior misdemeanor conviction because defendant had opened door), cert. denied, 213 Conn. 808 , 568 A.2d 793 (1989).
discussed Cited "see" Beinhorn v. Saraceno
Conn. App. Ct. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
Although we would treat this cause of action as malicious prosecution; see Lo Sacco v. Young, 20 Conn. App. 6,19-20 , 564 A.2d 610 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 808 , 568 A.2d 793 (1989); we will follow the trial court’s determination that this suit was in false arrest.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Leary (2×)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Horne, 19 Conn. App. 111, 138 , 562 A.2d 43 , cert. granted, 213 Conn. 807 , 568 A.2d 793 (1989), where the Appellate Court indicated that the meaning of “wrongful taking” and “wrongful withholding” as contained in General Statutes § 53a-133 (2), overlap.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mims v. Warden, State Prison
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
The length of time a defendant may have to spend in prison is clearly crucial to a decision of whether or not to plead guilty.” (Emphasis added.) Guadalupe v. Commissioner of Correction, 68 Conn. App. 376, 384 , 791 A.2d 640 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 913 , 796 A.2d 557 (2002); see also State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7, 10 , 404 A.2d 871 (1978). “[T]he purpose of the ‘jail-time’ statutes is to give recognition to the period of presentence time served and to permit the prisoner, in effect, to commence serving his sentence from the time he was compelled to remain in custody due to a mittimus…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Reginald Horne
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 29, 1989.
568 A.2d 793
G. Douglas Nash, public defender, in support of the petition., Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 19 Conn. App. Ill, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the trial of the defendant on four separate informations arising out of four incidents did not result in any substantial prejudice to the defendant because of the trial court’s instructions that the jury should consider each case separately?”