green
Positive treatment
8.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Chase
In Raucci, the court opined that ‘‘the defendant, in appealing his conviction and punishment, has volun- tarily called into play the validity of the entire sentenc- ing package, and, thus, the proper remedy is to vacate it in its entirety.’’ Id., 562.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Arceniega
In applying those principles, “the total effective sentence as originally imposed is the backdrop that must be kept in mind, not the individual sentences comprising the total term.” Id., 564.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Young
See State v. Raucci , 21 Conn. App. 557 , 562, 575 A.2d 234 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 817 , 576 A.2d 546 (1990) (proper remedy when defendant appeals punishment pursuant to multicount conviction is to vacate sentence in its entirety).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wade
See State v. Raucci , 21 Conn. App. 557 , 563, 575 A.2d 234 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 817 , 576 A.2d 546 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jason B.
The defendant further claimed that, because a new sentence cannot exceed the original total effective sentence imposed; see State v. Raucci, 21 Conn. App. 557, 563 , 575 A.2d 234 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 817 , 576 A.2d 546 (1990); and because parole is deemed to be an extension of the original period of incarceration; see State v. Tabone, 292 Conn. 417 , 429– 30, 973 A.2d 74 (2009); the trial court was required to deduct the period of special parole mandated by § 53a- 70 (b) (3) from his original total effective prison sen- tence, thereby leaving him with fourteen rather than fifteen years…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Victor O.
The defendant further claimed that, because a new sentence cannot exceed the original total effective sentence imposed; see State v. Raucci, 21 Conn. App. 557, 563 , 575 A.2d 234 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 817 , 576 A.2d 546 (1990); and because parole is deemed to be an extension of the original period of incarceration; see State v. Tabone, 292 Conn. 417 , 429– 30, 973 A.2d 74 (2009); the trial court was required to deduct the period of special parole mandated by § 53a- 70 (b) (3) from his original total effective prison sen- tence, thereby leaving him with fourteen rather than fifteen years…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Miranda
See State v. Raucci, 21 Conn. App. 557, 563 , 575 A.2d 234 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 817 , 576 A.2d 546 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Cator
Ed. 2d 817 (1989); see State v. Raucci, 21 Conn. App. 557, 558 , 575 A.2d 234 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 817 , 576 A.2d 546 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Harris
See State v. Raucci, 21 Conn. App. 557, 563 , 575 A.2d 234 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 817 , 576 A.2d 546 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Bosco v. J. Neale MacDonald Company, Inc., No. 094078 (Apr. 12, 1995)
See Accord, Vincent v. Litchfield Farms, Inc. , 21 Conn. App. 524 , 574 A.2d 834 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 815 , 576 A.2d 546 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dennis
See part I, supra. “The guiding principle is that the [trial] court may resentence the defendant ‘to achieve a rational, coherent [sentence] in light of the remaining convictions/ as long as the revised total effective sentence does not exceed the original.” State v. Raucci, 21 Conn. App. 557, 563 , 575 A.2d 234 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 817 , 576 A.2d 546 (1990) (resentencing after trial court vacated one of several criminal convictions), citing United States v. Bentley, 850 F.2d 327, 328-29 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 970 , 109 S. Ct. 501 , 102 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Raucci v. Warden
See State v. Raucci, 21 Conn. App. 557, 558 , 575 A.2d 234 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 817 , 576 A.2d 546 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tabone
Ed. 2d 175 (2002) (adopting aggregate package theory); see also State v. Raucci, 21 Conn. App. 557 , 575 A.2d 234 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 817 , 576 A.2d 546 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lawrence
See also State v. Raucci, 21 Conn. App. 557, 563 , 575 A.2d 234 (recognizing that Practice Book § 935, forerunner of Practice Book § 43-22, provides jurisdiction to trial court to grant or deny motion to correct illegal sentence), cert. denied, 215 Conn. 817 , 576 A.2d 546 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mims v. Warden, State Prison
The length of time a defendant may have to spend in prison is clearly crucial to a decision of whether or not to plead guilty.” (Emphasis added.) Guadalupe v. Commissioner of Correction, 68 Conn. App. 376, 384 , 791 A.2d 640 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 913 , 796 A.2d 557 (2002); see also State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7, 10 , 404 A.2d 871 (1978). “[T]he purpose of the ‘jail-time’ statutes is to give recognition to the period of presentence time served and to permit the prisoner, in effect, to commence serving his sentence from the time he was compelled to remain in custody due to a mittimus…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Juan Tirado
v.
Juan Tirado
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 21, 1990.
Brian J. Farrell, in support of the petition., Leah Hawley, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 21 Conn. App. 449, is denied.