Ventres v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Comm'n, 597 A.2d 344 (Conn. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Ventres v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Comm'n, 597 A.2d 344 (Conn. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Finley v. INLAND WETLANDS COM'N OF TOWN OF ORANGE (conn, 2008-10-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Finley v. INLAND WETLANDS COM'N OF TOWN OF ORANGE (2×)
Conn. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ventres v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission, 25 Conn. App. 572, 574 , 595 A.2d 914 (inadequate plan for erosion and sediment control is valid reason for denying wetlands permit), cert. denied, 220 Conn. 921 , 597 A.2d 344 (1991).
cited Cited "see" Milbauer v. Milbauer
Conn. App. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vickery v. Vickery, 25 Conn. App. 555, 559 , 595 A.2d 905 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 919 , 597 A.2d 344 (1991), and cases cited therein.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Three Levels Corp. v. Conservation Commission of Redding
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ventres v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission, 25 Conn. App. 572, 574, 595 A.2d 914 (inadequate plan for erosion and sediment control is valid reason for denying wetlands permit), cert. denied, 220 Conn. 921 , 597 A.2d 344 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fiske H. Ventres
v.
Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission of the Town of Burlington
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 3, 1991.
597 A.2d 344
Edward F. Scully, in support of the petition., Charles W. Bauer, in opposition.
Published

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 572, is denied.