green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
3.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1996 ·
…because the trial court based its judgment on breach of fiduciary duty, a matter not pleaded by the plaintiff, we reverse the judgment and remand the case for a new trial
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Albert D. Phelps, Inc. v. All Cty. P. C., No. Cv96 0154064 S (Aug. 28, 1997)
a claim under cutpa must be pleaded with particularity to allow evaluation of the legal theory upon which the claim is based.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
The Pequot Water Co. v. Brunelle, No. 5121 (May 10, 1996)
because the trial court based its judgment on breach of fiduciary duty, a matter not pleaded by the plaintiff, we reverse the judgment and remand the case for a new trial
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pequot Water Co. v. Brunelle, No. 5121 (May 10, 1996)
because the trial court based its judgment on breach of fiduciary duty, a matter not pleaded by the plaintiff, we reverse the judgment and remand the case for a new trial
discussed
Cited "see"
Duclos v. Hayes
See Pergament v. Green, 32 Conn. App. 644, 650 , 630 A.2d 615 (‘‘A fundamental tenet in our law is that the plaintiff’s complaint defines the dimensions of the issues to be litigated. [T]he right of a plaintiff to recover is limited to the allegations of [her] complaint.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.)), cert. denied, 228 Conn. 903 , 634 A.2d 296 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jacques All Trades Corp. v. Brown
See generally Pergament v. Green, 32 Conn. App. 644, 651 , 630 A.2d 615 , cert. denied, 228 Conn. 903 , 634 A.2d 296 (1993) (trial court’s consideration of fiduciary breach theory of liability that was not alleged in complaint affected court’s decision on matters properly alleged).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cleta Pergament
v.
Baerbel Green
v.
Baerbel Green
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 28, 1993.
Stephen A. Finn, in support of the petition., Jonathan M. Levine, in opposition.
Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (3)
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 644 (AC 11519), is denied.