green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Cappo v. Suda
See id. *10 We first ask whether the plaintiffs met their burden to obtain summary judgment on their complaint seeking to enjoin construction based on the restrictive covenants found in the parties’ deeds.
discussed
Cited "see"
Max's Place, LLC v. DJS REALTY, LLC
(2×)
See Shippan Point Assn., Inc. v. McManus, 34 Conn. App. 209, 212-13 , 641 A.2d 144 , cert, denied, 229 Conn. 923 , 642 A.2d 1215 (1994); Contegni v. Payne, 18 Conn. App. 47, 51 , 557 A.2d 122 , cert, denied, 211 Conn. 806 , 559 A.2d 1140 (1989). 5 On appeal, the defendant also challenges the admission into evidence of a certain deposition transcript.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Detullio v. Cholim, No. Cv96 033 48 92 S (Oct. 3, 1997)
(2×)
See also Shippan Point Assn., Inc. v. McManus, 34 Conn. App. 209 , 212 , 640 A.2d 1014 , cert. denied, 229 Conn. 923 , 642 A.2d 1215 (1994) (three classes of restrictive covenants recognized).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nichols v. Clark, No. 277623 (Dec. 17, 1996)
(2×)
See also Shippan Point Association v. McManus, Superior Court, judicial district of Stamford/Norwalk at Stamford, Docket No. 119682 (March 23, 1993, Lewis, J.), aff'd, 34 Conn. App. 209 , 640 A.2d 1014 , cert. denied, 229 Conn. 923 , 642 A.2d 1215 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shippan Point Association, Inc.
v.
Charles McManus
v.
Charles McManus
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 9, 1994.
Robert W. Green, in support of the petition., Leo Gold, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 209 (AC 12338), is denied.