green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.5 score
“we similarly conclude that the sanction imposed on the defendant by the department of correction in this ease did not constitute punishment for the purposes of double jeopardy.”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hernandez v. State
we similarly conclude that the sanction imposed on the defendant by the department of correction in this ease did not constitute punishment for the purposes of double jeopardy.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. CECIL J.
See State v. Harrison, 34 Conn. App. 473, 480-81 , 642 A.2d 36 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 907 , 648 A.2d 157 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Calderon
See State v. Harrison, 34 Conn. App. 473, 490 , 642 A.2d 36 (“purpose of marking an exhibit for identification is to preserve it as part of the record and to provide an appellate court with a basis for review” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 231 Conn. 907 , 648 A.2d 157 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Hickey v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Harrison, 34 Conn. App. 473, 490 , 642 A.2d 36 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 907 , 648 A.2d 157 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Alicea
See State v. Elijah, 34 Conn. App. 595, 596 , 642 A.2d 735 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 907 , 648 A.2d 157 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Angell
See State v. Harrison, 34 Conn. App. 473, 482 , 642 A.2d 36 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 907 , 648 A.2d 157 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Oden
Thus, we have consistently declined to review claims based on a ground different from that raised in the trial court ... or where the claim has not been raised before the trial court in the first instance.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Beliveau, 36 Conn. App. 228, 242 , 650 A.2d 591 (1994), aff'd, 237 Conn. 576 , 678 A.2d 924 (1996); see also State v. Harrison, 34 Conn. App. 473, 482-83 , 642 A.2d 36 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 907 , 648 A.2d 157 (1994); State v. Ulen, 31 Conn. App. 20, 29 , 623 A.2d 70 , cert. denied, 226 Conn. 905 , 625 A.2d 1378 (1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Beliveau
Ed. 2d 971 (1985); see also Practice Book §§ 288 and 4185.’ ” State v. Harrison, 34 Conn. App. 473, 482 , 642 A.2d 36 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 907 , 642 A.2d 36 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Denny Tate
v.
Denny Tate
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 14, 1994.
Christopher M. Cosgrove, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., John A. East III, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Texas (1)
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 610 (AC 12270), is denied.
[*908] Decided September 14, 1994 Christopher M. Cosgrove, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. John A. East III, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.