neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.3 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Aetna Life and Casualty Company
v.
Marie Braccidiferro
v.
Marie Braccidiferro
SC 15038.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 1994.
Michael P. Del Sole, in support of the petition.
Published
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 833 (AC 11058), is granted, limited to the following issues:
[*919] Decided September 20, 1994 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15038. Michael P. Del Sole, in support of the petition.“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that Public Acts 1993, No. 93-77, applied to the defendant’s claim because that claim was not a ‘final judgment’ within the meaning of Public Acts 1993, No. 93-77?
“2. If the answer to question 1. is yes, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the application of Public Acts 1993, No. 93-77, to the facts of this case did not violate the plaintiff’s rights under: (a) article first, § 1, of the Connecticut constitution; (b) article first, § 10, of the United States constitution; (c) the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution; or (d) article first, § 10, of the Connecticut constitution?”