Bushy v. Forster, 656 A.2d 669 (Conn. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Bushy v. Forster, 656 A.2d 669 (Conn. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Rogers (connappct, 1998-09-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Rogers
Conn. App. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Crosby, 36 Conn. App. 805, 820-21 , 654 A.2d 371 , cert. denied, 232 Conn. 921 , 656 A.2d 669 (1995) (state not required to produce direct numerical evidence of length of gun barrel to support conviction under § 53a-217); see State v. Williams, 231 Conn. 235, 251-52 , 645 A.2d 999 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Perry
Conn. App. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Crosby, 36 Conn. App. 805, 821 , 654 A.2d 371 , cert. denied, 232 Conn. 921 , 656 A.2d 669 (1995) (testimony that gun not as long as piece of paper shown to witness that was less than twelve inches in length); State v. Gonzalez, 25 Conn. App. 433, 444 , 596 A.2d 443 (1991), aff'd, 222 Conn. 718 , 609 A.2d 1003 (1992) (small caliber gun pulled from defendant’s back pocket).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Carter
Conn. App. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
As a result, we have “no way of divining what evidence the state might have presented to rebut the defendant’s claim of an unconstitutional identification procedure . . . .” State v. Tatum, 219 Conn. 721 , 727 n.11, 595 A.2d 322 (1991); see State v. Crosby, 36 Conn. App. 805, 819-20 , 654 A.2d 371 , cert. denied, 232 Conn. 921 , 656 A.2d 669 (1995) (without necessary factual and legal conclusions regarding reliability of out-of-court identification furnished by trial court, court on appeal left to speculate).
cited Cited "see" State v. Hilton
Conn. App. Ct. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Crosby, 36 Conn. App. 805, 809 , 654 A.2d 371 , cert. denied, 232 Conn. 921 , 656 A.2d 669 (1995).
cited Cited "see" State v. Pettway
Conn. App. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Crosby, 36 Conn. App. 805, 815 , 654 A.2d 371 , cert. denied, 232 Conn. 921 , 656 A.2d 669 (1995); State v. Leonard, supra, 31 Conn. App. 178 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Davis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Brunson, 36 Conn. App. 576, 582 , 651 A.2d 1335 (discussing § 29-35 and its incorporation of the geographical limitations set forth in § 29-28), cert. denied, 232 Conn. 920 , 656 A.2d 669 (1995); see also State v. Beauton, supra, 170 Conn. 239 (state presented evidence pertaining to local permit in one municipality but failed to present evidence that defendant lacked state permit or permit from other municipality); State v. Nelson, 17 Conn. App. 556 , 561–62, 555 A.2d 426 (1989) (same).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Lewis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Crosby, 36 Conn. App. 805, 820-21 , 654 A.2d 371 (finding piece of paper to show gun was less than twelve inches sufficient), cert. denied, 232 Conn. 921 , 656 A.2d 669 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Terry K. Bushy
v.
George E. Forster
SC 15227.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 23, 1995.
656 A.2d 669
Herbert Watstein, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 12729) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Was the Appellate Court correct in dismissing the plaintiffs’ appeal for lack of a final judgment as to the defendant George Forster when judgment was entered in favor of the defendant George Forster against the plaintiffs because the case is still pending against the defendant Judith Forster?”