green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Terio v. Rama
(2×)
See Hayes v. Manchester Memorial Hospital, 38 Conn. App. 471, 475 , 661 A.2d 123 (exclusion determined to be harmful where “plaintiff was deprived of the right to have the jury, as trier of fact, weigh the credibility of the expert witness by assessing his motives for testifying as he did”), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 922 , 666 A.2d 1185 (1995); Chouinard v. Marjani, supra, 21 Conn. App. 577 -78 (“court’s evidentiary ruling prevented the jury from considering relevant and material evidence affecting the ultimate issue as to whether the defendant had the plaintiffs oral consent for the bil…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ramos v. Ramos
(2×)
See Hayes v. Manchester Memorial Hospital, 38 Conn. App. 471, 475 , 661 A.2d 123 (“burden of showing that the evidence may unduly arouse the jurors’ emotions of hostility or sympathy rests with the party claiming prejudice”), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 922 , 666 A.2d 1185 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Amneris P.
(2×)
See Hayes v. Manchester Memorial Hospital, 38 Conn. App. 471, 475 , 661 A.2d 123 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 922 , 666 A.2d 1185 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Musorofiti v. Vlcek
(2×)
We previously have allowed cross-examination of an expert relating to a malpractice action where that line of inquiry went to motive and bias; see Hayes v. Manches ter Memorial Hospital, 38 Conn. App. 471, 474-75 , 661 A.2d 123 , cert, denied, 235 Conn. 922 , 666 A.2d 1185 (1995); but we know of no authority that any expert who testifies as to his or her qualifications opens the door to an unfettered cross-examination of any malpractice claims made against that expert, however old, that are wholly unrelated to the proposed testimony and serve no purpose but to show that the expert “has made …
discussed
Cited "see"
Dubreuil v. Witt
(2×)
See Hayes v. Manchester Memorial Hospital, 38 Conn. App. 471, 475 , 661 A.2d 123 , cert, denied, 235 Conn. 922 , 666 A.2d 1185 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Antonios v. Farmers Ins. Exchange, No. Cv93-0117917s (Apr. 2, 1998)
See Chapman v. Norfolk Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance Co. , 39 Conn. App. 306 , 330-33 , 665 A.2d 112 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1185 (1995); Practice Book § 177.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Webster
We thus read the statute as if it contained a comma after the word delivery: [s]ale is any delivery, which includes barter, exchange or gift or offer therefor . . . .” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 195; see also State v. Theriault, 38 Conn. App. 815, 825-26 , 663 A.2d 423 , cert, denied, 235 Conn. 922 , 666 A.2d 1188 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Singleton
See State v. Smith, 73 Conn. App. 173, 178 , 807 A.2d 500 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 923 , 812 A.2d 865 (2002); see also State v. Theriault, 38 Conn. App. 815 , 823 n.7, 663 A.2d 423 (“[although we find the defendant’s [jury charge claim] dispositive, we must address the sufficiency of the evidence claim since the defendant would be entitled to an acquittal of the charge if she prevails on this claim”), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 922 , 666 A.2d 1188 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HELEN HAYES
v.
MANCHESTER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
v.
MANCHESTER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 27, 1995.
Louis B. Blumenfeld, in support of the petition., Louis W. Flynn, Jr., in opposition.
Published
The defendant Wells Jacobson’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 471 (AC 12453), is denied.