In re Jonathan M., 701 A.2d 661 (Conn. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Jonathan M., 701 A.2d 661 (Conn. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Smith v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2024-06-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Smith v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smith, 46 Conn. App. 285, 286 , 699 A.2d 250 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 930 , 701 A.2d 662 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Bryan
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Harris, 46 Conn. App. 216, 236 , 700 A.2d 1161 (“[a] defendant is entitled to have instructions presented relating to any theory of defense for which there is any foundation in the evidence, no matter how weak or incredible” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 930 , 701 A.2d 662 (1997). *609 We conclude that the defendant met his burden of providing an evidentiary foundation to inject the issue of defense of others into the case.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Davis
Conn. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Harris, 46 Conn. App. 216, 236 , 700 A.2d 1161 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 930 , 701 A.2d 662 (1997) (“[A] defendant is entitled to have instructions presented relating to any theory of defense for which there is any foundation in the evidence, no matter how weak or incredible ....
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Kevin K. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
Even if this accusation was true, the use of false representations “are common investigative techniques and would rarely, if ever, be sufficient to overbear the defendant’s will and to bring about a confession . . . .” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Pinder, 250 Conn. 385, 423 , 736 A.2d 857 (1999); see also In re Jonathan M., 46 Conn. App. 545, 552 , 700 A.2d 1370 (fact that detective and mother told juvenile they knew he was lying did not constitute coercion undermining trustworthiness of confession), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 930 , 701 A.2d 661 (1997).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Billie
Conn. App. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Newton, 8 Conn. App. 528, 531 , 513 A.2d 1261 (1986); see also State v. Thurman, 10 Conn. App. 302, 306 , 523 A.2d 891 , cert. denied, 204 Conn. 805 , 528 A.2d 1152 (1987).” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Harris, 46 Conn. App. 216, 242-43 , 700 A.2d 1161 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 930 , 701 A.2d 662 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IN RE JONATHAN M.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 9, 1997.
701 A.2d 661
Mark Shapera, deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Norcott.
Published

Lead Opinion

The respondent’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 46 Conn. App. 545 (AC 14693), is denied.

Dissent

NORCOTT, J.,

dissenting. I would grant the respondent’s petition for certification to appeal.

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.